On Saturday, 19 November 2016 11:46:29 CET Gard Spreemann wrote:
> I guess we can just skip the test on armel?
Oh wait, scratch that, that's stupid: Now that I think about it, it's
certainly possible that fastcluster's code itself relies on correctly
identifying NaNs. I can have a closer look in t
On Friday, 18 November 2016 14:57:29 CET Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> python-fastcluster seems to have an issue in the test suite for armel[1]:
>
Hi,
Interesting! Since the test passed on all other architectures, could
it be that certain Python floating point exceptions are simply not
raised o
2 matches
Mail list logo
