On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Julien Muchembled wrote:
> Bug#842870: ITP: zodbpickle -- Fork of pickle module, for ZODB
Please ensure the security team are informed about this fork, via
their embedded-code-copies file:
https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.deb
Donald Stufft writes:
> /usr/bin/python3 being Python 4.x is a bit weird though
Seriously? Who is proposing that?
> and it’s likely that Python 4.x is not going to be another break the
> world release.
Certainly the command ‘python3’ should only ever point to the Python 3
interpreter.
If upst
Hi,
> I write to debian-python, because some of the involved packages are
> not specific to Zope. Actually, I even think that ZODB itself is not
> specific to Zope, but well, changing section of existing packages can
> be another topic.
This has already been discussed but all the package
On November 1, 2016 8:43:50 PM EDT, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
>> On Nov 1, 2016, at 6:03 PM, Scott Kitterman
>wrote:
>>
>> Even after python2.7 is removed from Debian, there will still be
>users who
>> keep a local copy because they couldn't migrate things due to
>$REASONS. Re-
>> using /usr/bi
Le 11/01/16 à 20:10, Julien Muchembled a écrit :
> * python-btrees & python-zodbpickle (done)
> https://github.com/zopefoundation/BTrees
> https://github.com/zopefoundation/zodbpickle
>
> - new packages
> - Debian Python Modules Team
>
> [...]
>
> * python-zeo (not started)
> https://github.com/
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 6:03 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> Even after python2.7 is removed from Debian, there will still be users who
> keep a local copy because they couldn't migrate things due to $REASONS. Re-
> using /usr/bin/python for a python3 version won't accomplish anything more
> than
On Tuesday, November 01, 2016 05:14:21 PM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Nov 01, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >I don't think /usr/bin/python should ever point to a python3 version. It
> >should be dropped when python2.7 is removed. I think the existence of
> >/usr/bin/python2 is a limite
On Nov 01, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>I don't think /usr/bin/python should ever point to a python3 version. It
>should be dropped when python2.7 is removed. I think the existence of
>/usr/bin/python2 is a limited to a work around for a specific distros
>insanity. There's no need
Hello,
I am co-maintaining the 'zodb' package and I am also an upstream developer.
http://www.zodb.org/ - a native object database for Python
Debian currently packages branch 3.x of ZODB, which is getting quite old, with
only support for Python 2. It's been a while that I am working locally in
On November 1, 2016 10:28:01 AM EDT, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>Over in #834193, a user is asking for a /usr/bin/pip2 to mirror
>/usr/bin/pip
>because some uses cases apparently prefer pip2 over pip. That seems
>like a
>reasonable request on the face of it, and easy to support.
>
>However, I thought,
Over in #834193, a user is asking for a /usr/bin/pip2 to mirror /usr/bin/pip
because some uses cases apparently prefer pip2 over pip. That seems like a
reasonable request on the face of it, and easy to support.
However, I thought, well why not shebang pip2 to /usr/bin/python2 because 1)
it would
11 matches
Mail list logo
