Re: [Python-modules-team] RM of shiboken & pyside ?

2016-07-05 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Didier and Scott, On July 6, 2016 7:32:22 AM GMT+03:00, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tuesday, July 05, 2016 06:00:25 PM Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > Now that we have PyOtherSide in Debian, and that both shiboken and > > PySide are somewhat broken in sid & stretch; what ab

Re: [Python-modules-team] RM of shiboken & pyside ?

2016-07-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, July 05, 2016 06:00:25 PM Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Hi there, > > Now that we have PyOtherSide in Debian, and that both shiboken and > PySide are somewhat broken in sid & stretch; what about just removing > them from Debian ? > > I'm not a PySide user myself, and it's abandonned u

Re: Python package providing both modules and an app

2016-07-05 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 07/05/2016 04:47 PM, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote: > Hi Thomas, > >> I did lots of that in OpenStack. You can have a look at one of our tool >> to handle the dh_auto_install for Python: >> >> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-pkg-tools.git/tree/build-tools/pkgos-dh_auto_install >> >> Th

Re: Python package providing both modules and an app

2016-07-05 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
Hi Thomas, > I did lots of that in OpenStack. You can have a look at one of our tool > to handle the dh_auto_install for Python: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-pkg-tools.git/tree/build-tools/pkgos-dh_auto_install > > The way to use it in your debian/rules file is to do: >

Re: Removing me from Uploader field of html5lib

2016-07-05 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jul 04, 2016, at 04:52 PM, Olivier Berger wrote: >Unfortunately, I'm no longer able to dedicate time to help maintaining >the html5lib package. Thanks so much for your past work on it! >Thus I'm requesting that anyone uploading the next version as part of >the team, please remove me from the

Re: Python package providing both modules and an app

2016-07-05 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 06/22/2016 09:51 PM, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote: > Hi Ben, > >>> The package is originally requested as a Python module[2] and it seems >>> clear to me that the whole thing is only useful as a library >> >> I don't understand this statement. If it is *only* useful as a library, >> why install the com

Re: Python package providing both modules and an app

2016-07-05 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 06/21/2016 11:13 PM, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote: > Hi all ! > > I'm currently packaging python-slugify[0], a Python application for > slugifying unicode strings. Like here[1] upstream decided to write > everything as a python module with an entry script placed in /usr/bin > that calls main(). So we c