On 05/11/2016 02:31 PM, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On 11/05/16 13:19, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 05/11/2016 11:31 AM, Christopher Baines wrote:
>>> On 23/12/15 15:30, Christopher Baines wrote:
On 23/12/15 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I was the maintainer of this package, though I lost
FTR:
[Piotr Ożarowski, 2016-05-11]
> dh_auto_install -- --install-lib=/usr/share/pyfr/
this one ^ should be:
dh_auto_install -- --install-args='--install-lib=/usr/share/pyfr/'
or you can:
export PYBUILD_INSTALL_ARGS=--install-lib=/usr/share/pyfr/
(thanks to Dmitry Shachnev for notici
[Ghislain Vaillant, 2016-05-11]
> Dear all,
>
> I have a package (pyfr), which is meant to be used as a command-line
> application only.
>
> The main script (pyfr) is installed via setuptools'
> entry_points['console_scripts'], which generates the entry-point
> automatically and places it under /
Dear all,
I have a package (pyfr), which is meant to be used as a command-line
application only.
The main script (pyfr) is installed via setuptools'
entry_points['console_scripts'], which generates the entry-point
automatically and places it under /usr/bin. However, when I install the
implementa
On May 10, 2016, at 09:56 PM, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
>I think it would be great if we could get performance-sensitive applications
>running on PyPy instead of CPython, but of course this requires the whole
>dependency graph to have pypy-* packages built.
That might be a good approach to buildin
On 11/05/16 13:19, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 11:31 AM, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> On 23/12/15 15:30, Christopher Baines wrote:
>>> On 23/12/15 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I was the maintainer of this package, though I lost interest for it
because there's no reverse dependen
On 05/11/2016 11:31 AM, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On 23/12/15 15:30, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> On 23/12/15 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> I was the maintainer of this package, though I lost interest for it
>>> because there's no reverse dependency for it.
>>
>> Thanks for packaging it :)
>>
Hey,
Is anyone available to review and upload a new version of
python-django-tagging [1][2]?
The changelog is:
* New upstream release
* Convert debian/copyright to the DEP-5 format
* Add myself as an uploader
* Remove the fix_calc_tag_weight patch, as this has been merged upstream
* Rem
On 23/12/15 15:30, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On 23/12/15 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> I was the maintainer of this package, though I lost interest for it
>> because there's no reverse dependency for it.
>
> Thanks for packaging it :)
>
>> If you want to continue maintaining it within the Ope
9 matches
Mail list logo