On January 4, 2016 2:18:22 PM EST, "W. Martin Borgert"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>TLDR: Both are the same, providing the "socks" module. We should
>remove one of them. Maybe renaming the other to python-socks.
>
>Longer story: Recently, I upgraded the outdated python-socksipy
>package. This involved follow
Hi,
TLDR: Both are the same, providing the "socks" module. We should
remove one of them. Maybe renaming the other to python-socks.
Longer story: Recently, I upgraded the outdated python-socksipy
package. This involved following a new upstream. Later I was
informed, that the new upstream was alrea
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Fladischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: django-python3-ldap
Version : 0.9.8
Upstream Author : Dave Hall
* URL : https://github.com/etianen/django-python3-ldap
* License : BSD-3
On Dec 31, 2015, at 04:44 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>Does anyone object if I go ahead and ask the release team for a transition
>slot?
+1 and thanks!
-Barry
On 01/01/16 15:44, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> I've read the policy from
> https://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/policy.html and I accept it (in
> fact, I love the idea behind collaborative maintenance, collab-maint,
> and I subscribed to LowThresholdNmu as well).
>
> There are three python packages t
On Jan 04, 2016, at 04:41 AM, Giovanni Pellerano wrote:
>i was reading https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2015/10/msg00267.html
>while working on GlobaLeaks (https://github.com/globaleaks/GlobaLeaks)
>and evaluate it's adoption as replacement for python-storm that
>appears not to be an abandon
6 matches
Mail list logo
