Re: Keeping upstream commits separate from Debian packaging commits

2014-10-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/10/2014 12:59 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > Scott Kitterman writes: > >> Changing the number of commits is solving the wrong problem. The >> problem that needs to be solved is including upstream commits. That's >> thoroughly uninteresting for a packaging team. > > Agreed. This is a direct result

Re: Fwd: [Python-modules-commits] [python-mplexporter] 135/135: Merge pull request #30 from rainwoodman/patch-1

2014-10-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 09/24/2014 10:51 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > In addition to the mail list, the commits for just one package made > #debian-python unusable a couple of times today. The KGB bot is configurable to have limits. I did that with my own KGB bot, and it works every well. On 09/24/2014 10:51 AM, Scot

Re: Keeping upstream commits separate from Debian packaging commits (was: Fighting commit storm madness)

2014-10-11 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2014-10-10 13:13, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Looking at that code, IMHO it should be sufficient to add the arguments > '--' and 'debian' to all calls of "git revlist". Who can add this? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble