restarting services after security upgrades in pure-Python modules?

2014-05-15 Thread Paul Wise
Hi all, Anyone know if it is possible to detect processes that are using old versions of pure-Python modules after security upgrades to them? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: wheel support for Debian?

2014-05-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 18:32:01 Barry Warsaw wrote: > My thoughts... > > On May 16, 2014, at 12:07 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > > - should we add wheels everywhere? I don't think we should, > > > > but I'd like to state this somewhere, like in the python policy. > > Agreed, we should not add

Re: wheel support for Debian?

2014-05-15 Thread Donald Stufft
On May 15, 2014, at 6:32 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > My thoughts... > > On May 16, 2014, at 12:07 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> - should we add wheels everywhere? I don't think we should, >> but I'd like to state this somewhere, like in the python policy. > > Agreed, we should not add wheels

Re: wheel support for Debian?

2014-05-15 Thread Barry Warsaw
My thoughts... On May 16, 2014, at 12:07 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > - should we add wheels everywhere? I don't think we should, > but I'd like to state this somewhere, like in the python policy. Agreed, we should not add wheels everywhere. I would like to keep it very limited to exactly the

wheel support for Debian?

2014-05-15 Thread Matthias Klose
Issue #748299 asks about adding wheel support for setuptools. I know about the special case for pip and it's dependencies, however I would like to see to have wheel support addressed first before applying such a patch. - should we add wheels everywhere? I don't think we should, but I'd like t