python-future: clean single-source support for Python 2/3

2014-02-04 Thread Brian May
Hello, Has anybody considered packaging python-future for Debian? No, I am not talking about python-futures, python-concurrency.futures, or anything relating to #736523 (the first message in this bug had rather confused at first). Rather I am talking about: http://python-future.org/ "future is

Bug#737647: RFA: python-pefile -- Portable Executable (PE) parsing module for Python

2014-02-04 Thread Robert Edmonds
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I don't have any current need for python-pefile myself and I don't have time to maintain it, so I'm requesting that someone adopt it. Thanks! -- Robert Edmonds edmo...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature

A quick question about sponsored content for nedprod.com

2014-02-04 Thread Marie Weston
Hi,   I'm emailing you today to ask if you would be interested in accepting a sponsored article for your site nedprod.com. If you're interested or you would just like to know more, let me know and I'd be happy to send you more information.   Kind regards. Marie Weston Digital Media

Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same

2014-02-04 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 06:35:56PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Sandro has orphaned python-concurrent.futures: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736714 > > > > Since it is team maintained, I don't think it really makes sense. Should > > we just close the bug report and remo

Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same

2014-02-04 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/31/2014 03:20 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote: > [...] > > Sandro has orphaned python-concurrent.futures: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736714 > > Since it is team maintained, I don't think it really makes sense. Should > we just close the bug report and remove Sandro from th