Kerrick Staley wrote:
>What's not included in "some newer releases" here? /usr/bin/python2 has
>been present on all systems I've used except Debian.
>
>- Kerrick
It looks to me like the latest Centos ships with python2.6 and /usr/bin/python2
only shipped with 2.7.
Scott K
>
>On Sat, Sep 14
What's not included in "some newer releases" here? /usr/bin/python2 has
been present on all systems I've used except Debian.
- Kerrick
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>
> Kerrick Staley wrote:
> >Thanks!
> >
> >The upstream recommendation (from PEP 394 [1]) is that, g
Kerrick Staley wrote:
>Thanks!
>
>The upstream recommendation (from PEP 394 [1]) is that, going forward,
>portable scripts *can't* assume python is python2, and *should* use
>python2.
>
>- Kerrick
>
>[1] http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/
I'm very familiar with it.
Now we get to Arch is
Thanks!
The upstream recommendation (from PEP 394 [1]) is that, going forward,
portable scripts *can't* assume python is python2, and *should* use
python2.
- Kerrick
[1] http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> So that is the showstopper? I thought I've seen other Debian packages
> based on development releases, so I thought maybe b1 would have a chance
> of making it out of experimental...
Yes, I don't like the idea of having beta releases in unst
5 matches
Mail list logo