Re: python-enum34

2013-06-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 22, 2013, at 07:28 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: >are the enums already stable enough for backports? >3.4 is still quite a while away. I think so, yes. The PEP 435 has been accepted and the code is in 3.4's Mercurial tree[1]. I have a branch adaptings Mailman 3 from using flufl.enum to enum34

Re: python-enum34

2013-06-22 Thread Julian Taylor
On 22.06.2013 19:19, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I filed an ITP to package enum34, which is the backport of Python 3.4's enum > package: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712881 are the enums already stable enough for backports? 3.4 is still quite a while away. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

python-enum34

2013-06-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
I filed an ITP to package enum34, which is the backport of Python 3.4's enum package: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712881 I intend to add this to the team svn and have it team maintained. I'm still working on the build rules - it's a bit tricky because of the cross-Python-ver