Re: Bug#708573: trac-accountmanager: Please remove Python Applications Packaging Team as maintainer

2013-05-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, May 17, 2013 02:13:10 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 05/17/2013 01:55 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > You misunderstand. > > I don't think i misunderstood at all. > > > I'm all for having a good common environment for the team to work on. I > > happen to think you suggested just ab

Re: Bug#708573: trac-accountmanager: Please remove Python Applications Packaging Team as maintainer

2013-05-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
On May 17, 2013, at 01:55 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >So I'm all for improvement, but it should be an improvement. I'd love it if >we we using a DVCS, but I don't think full source branches are a good idea. I wonder if there is a way to have our cake and eat it too. Meaning: is there a way to

Re: Bug#708573: trac-accountmanager: Please remove Python Applications Packaging Team as maintainer

2013-05-17 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 05/17/2013 01:55 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > You misunderstand. I don't think i misunderstood at all. > I'm all for having a good common environment for the team to work on. I > happen to think you suggested just about the worst one possible. I've tried > it and I find it much more compl

Re: Bug#708573: trac-accountmanager: Please remove Python Applications Packaging Team as maintainer

2013-05-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, May 17, 2013 01:50:09 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 05/17/2013 01:40 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > If the team moves to full source git archives, I'll just drop the team > > from > > all the packages I maintain. > > > > Scott K > > > > P.S. See, now the fun begins. > > fun, ind

Re: Bug#708573: trac-accountmanager: Please remove Python Applications Packaging Team as maintainer

2013-05-17 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 05/17/2013 01:40 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > If the team moves to full source git archives, I'll just drop the team from > all the packages I maintain. > > Scott K > > P.S. See, now the fun begins. fun, indeed. it sounds to me like you're saying: A) re: #708573 if some members of the

Re: Bug#708573: trac-accountmanager: Please remove Python Applications Packaging Team as maintainer

2013-05-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, May 17, 2013 01:33:38 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 05/17/2013 01:20 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > > This came up recently on debian-python. It's a very long thread, but the > > basic outcome was that, while quite a few people wanted to move away from > > svn, there was very little co

Re: Bug#708573: trac-accountmanager: Please remove Python Applications Packaging Team as maintainer

2013-05-17 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 05/17/2013 01:20 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > This came up recently on debian-python. It's a very long thread, but the > basic outcome was that, while quite a few people wanted to move away from > svn, there was very little consensus on which VCS to migrate to, whether to > include full source t

Re: Bug#708573: trac-accountmanager: Please remove Python Applications Packaging Team as maintainer

2013-05-17 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 17 May 2013 17:52, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > We've been through this a number of times for both PAPT and DPMT. We > want a > > common repository for each team (not split between different VCSs). > There's > > been discussion about what would be needed to migrate from SVN to > something

Re: Bug#708573: trac-accountmanager: Please remove Python Applications Packaging Team as maintainer

2013-05-17 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
[dropping the bug report from the cc list] On 05/17/2013 11:49 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > We've been through this a number of times for both PAPT and DPMT. We want a > common repository for each team (not split between different VCSs). There's > been discussion about what would be needed to

Re: Bug#708573: trac-accountmanager: Please remove Python Applications Packaging Team as maintainer

2013-05-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, May 17, 2013 10:53:39 AM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 05/17/2013 08:22 AM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > Quoting "Scott Kitterman" : > >> Package: trac-accountmanager > > > > ... > > > >> Since the package has been removed from the PAPT repository, please > >> remove > >> PAPT as mai

Re: Hand pygame maintainership over to Debian Python Modules Team?

2013-05-17 Thread A Mennucc
Hi, it is fine for me, go ahead. a. On 17/05/2013 11:38, Vincent Cheng wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote: >> Hi Andrea and Ed, >> >> Would it be ok with you if we were to set pygame's maintainer to the >> Debian Python Modules Team >> ? I'm personally in >> favour of m

Bug#708654: ITP: unittest-xml-reporting -- Python unittest-based test runner with Ant/JUnit like XML reporting

2013-05-17 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonathan Wiltshire * Package name: unittest-xml-reporting Version : 1.4.3 Upstream Author : Daniel Fernandes Martins * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/unittest-xml-reporting * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: Pytho

Re: Hand pygame maintainership over to Debian Python Modules Team?

2013-05-17 Thread Ed Boraas
Assigning maintainership to the team makes sense to me (and I favour team maintainership as well), but I'd like to hear Andrea's thoughts. As noted, my activity level has been quite low of late, and I wouldn't want my opinion taken to have too much significance. Realistically, I'm not likely to be

Re: Hand pygame maintainership over to Debian Python Modules Team?

2013-05-17 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote: > Hi Andrea and Ed, > > Would it be ok with you if we were to set pygame's maintainer to the > Debian Python Modules Team > ? I'm personally in > favour of moving as many packages as possible over to team > maintainership, and pygame is importa