On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:04:00 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2013, at 04:52 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> >> Is #4 really that horrible?
> >>
> >IMO, yes.
>
> https://github.com/nose-devs/nose/issues/634
>
> captures a proposal that Dmitry made on #ubuntu-devel, which seems good to
On Feb 26, 2013, at 04:52 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Is #4 really that horrible?
>>
>IMO, yes.
https://github.com/nose-devs/nose/issues/634
captures a proposal that Dmitry made on #ubuntu-devel, which seems good to
me. I'll bring this issue up on the tip list.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:32:56 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2013, at 11:51 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
>
> >1. Status quo: Provide a nosetests-3.X script for the default version at
> > build time.
> > Pros: None
> > Cons:
> > - This potentially breaks unit tests if there are tw
On Feb 22, 2013, at 11:51 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
>1. Status quo: Provide a nosetests-3.X script for the default version at
> build time.
> Pros: None
> Cons:
> - This potentially breaks unit tests if there are two supported 3.x
> versions.
>2. Drop all nosetsts-3.X scripts.
> Pros
4 matches
Mail list logo