Hi Jakub,
many thanks for your thorough review of the package.
Distribution in the changelog should be experimental, not unstable (as
the package cannot be currently built within unstable).
Missing ")" in the changelog.
Pet peeve: I'd use "debhelper (>= 8)" instead of "debhelper (>= 8.0.0)".
Hi Jakub,
many thanks for your thorough review of the package.
Distribution in the changelog should be experimental, not unstable (as
the package cannot be currently built within unstable).
Missing ")" in the changelog.
Pet peeve: I'd use "debhelper (>= 8)" instead of "debhelper (>= 8.0.0)".
2 matches
Mail list logo
