Bug 664759: python-tox request for review/sponsorship

2012-11-09 Thread Barry Warsaw
Bug 664759 is the ITP for python-tox. Back in June, Bradley M. Froehle provided an initial packaging. I finally found some time to take his work, add a few things (manpage, updated to latest tox version, debian/watch, lintian clean), and svn-injected it into the PAPT repo. http://anonscm.debian.

Re: pyxs review

2012-11-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, November 09, 2012 01:32:53 PM Thomas Kluyver wrote: > On 9 November 2012 12:44, Maykel Moya wrote: > > Even in the case of the more restrictive license applying only to > > debian/* work? Could you/someone elaborate a little the implications of > > this (link to fine documentation is we

Re: Sponsorship ??

2012-11-09 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Joseph Mills , 2012-11-07, 16:51: Hello there I am not sure that this is going to the correct team but here it goes. I found this upstream http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-labs/gimp-qmlexporter so I took it and packaged it. Now I want to get it into debian so that it will make its-way to Ubuntu. W

Re: GUI tool for packaging

2012-11-09 Thread Omer Zak
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 13:19 +, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > In my opinion, the best way to do that is to build a GUI that holds > the user's hand through the process of packaging, showing them the > options available. It should be particularly useful for occasional > packagers who don't want to rem

Re: pyxs review

2012-11-09 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Maykel Moya , 2012-11-09, 13:44: I'd advise you not to use a more restrictive license than upstream uses. Even in the case of the more restrictive license applying only to debian/* work? Could you/someone elaborate a little the implications of this (link to fine documentation is welcomed)?

Re: pyxs review

2012-11-09 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 9 November 2012 12:44, Maykel Moya wrote: > Even in the case of the more restrictive license applying only to > debian/* work? Could you/someone elaborate a little the implications of > this (link to fine documentation is welcomed)? > I'm not sure if there's a Debian rule about it, but I'd co

GUI tool for packaging

2012-11-09 Thread Thomas Kluyver
This is an idea I've had knocking around for a while. Packaging is complex - there are lots of different tools and syntaxes you have to understand to do a good job of it - quilt, debhelper, watch files, etc. - along with specialist terminology. I know various CLI tools aim to simplify things, but n

Re: pyxs review

2012-11-09 Thread Maykel Moya
El 08/11/12 23:08, Jakub Wilk escribió: Hello > I'd advise you not to use a more restrictive license than upstream uses. Even in the case of the more restrictive license applying only to debian/* work? Could you/someone elaborate a little the implications of this (link to fine documentation is w