Re: Sympy 0.7.2

2012-10-28 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
What was the MathJax complain about? I maybe can help you with that. -- Dmitry Shachnev On 10/28/12, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > On 28 October 2012 08:47, Jakub Wilk wrote: > >> I assume that building the binary packages from a single source package is preferred? >>> sympy devs reckon w

Re: Sympy 0.7.2

2012-10-28 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 28 October 2012 08:47, Jakub Wilk wrote: > I assume that building the binary packages from a single source package >>> is preferred? >>> >> sympy devs reckon we should use the separate release tarballs. Is that >> acceptable for Debian? >> > > Yes. OK. I've committed the minor changes (diff

Re: #! /usr/bin/python{,3} -Es

2012-10-28 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Oct 27, 2012, at 06:53 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: >* Thomas Kluyver , 2012-10-26, 11:03: >>Are there any situations where you might want to run a system script >with >>modified Python environment variables? I can't think of any off >the top of >>my head. Here's the list of environment variables: >

Re: Sympy 0.7.2

2012-10-28 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Thomas Kluyver , 2012-10-28, 08:41: I assume that building the binary packages from a single source package is preferred? sympy devs reckon we should use the separate release tarballs. Is that acceptable for Debian? Yes. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@list

Re: Sympy 0.7.2

2012-10-28 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On Oct 25, 2012 6:31 PM, "Thomas Kluyver" wrote: > I assume that building the binary packages from a single source > package is preferred? sympy devs reckon we should use the separate release tarballs. Is that acceptable for Debian? Thomas