Re: Bug#668841: RFS: yp-svipc/0.13-1 [ITP] -- System V InterProcess Communication for Python/Yorick

2012-04-18 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Hi, Le 18/04/12 21:03, Jakub Wilk a écrit : > (I don't intend to sponsor this package.) Thanks for the comments nevertheless. I've fixed them all. In the meantime, upstream succeeded in porting this extension to python 3, so I've updated the package accordingly: http://mentors.debian.net/package/

Re: How do I add support for python3 to my package?

2012-04-18 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Apr 18, 2012, at 03:09 PM, Paul Elliott wrote: >Nobody thinks python3 is important enough to have a debhelper infrastructure? I wouldn't say that. I'd say that the higher level tools are simply lagging behind demand. The low-level tools are available and won't significantly change. As Scott

Re: How do I add support for python3 to my package?

2012-04-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 03:09:35 PM Paul Elliott wrote: > On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 02:46:33 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: > > No. You'd need overrides for a python3 only source package as well. The > > fundamental problem is debhelper doesn't know about building for python3. > > That doesn't

Re: How do I add support for python3 to my package?

2012-04-18 Thread Paul Elliott
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 02:46:33 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: > No. You'd need overrides for a python3 only source package as well. The > fundamental problem is debhelper doesn't know about building for python3. > That doesn't change no matter how many source packages you split it up > into. >

Re: How do I add support for python3 to my package?

2012-04-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 02:35:20 PM Paul Elliott wrote: > On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 10:49:34 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Alternately you could invest a little time in understanding what Barry's > > written up and build both sets of binaries from one source. This is the > > usual method.

Re: How do I add support for python3 to my package?

2012-04-18 Thread Paul Elliott
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 10:49:34 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: > Alternately you could invest a little time in understanding what Barry's > written up and build both sets of binaries from one source. This is the > usual method. The problem is not understanding. It is a problem of style. Let

Re: Bug#668841: RFS: yp-svipc/0.13-1 [ITP] -- System V InterProcess Communication for Python/Yorick

2012-04-18 Thread Jakub Wilk
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.) * Thibaut Paumard , 2012-04-18, 09:32: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yp-svipc/yp-svipc_0.13-1.dsc Lintian emits: P: yp-svipc source: debian-control-has-unusual-field-spacing line 5 The following files have even more unusual spacing: li

Re: RFS: python3-dateutil

2012-04-18 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 18 April 2012 18:03, Jakub Wilk wrote: > But anyway, I bumped timestamp in the changelog, built, signed and uploaded > the package. Thanks. Thanks Jakub, and thanks for taking the time to go through all these things with me. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.de

Re: RFS: python3-dateutil

2012-04-18 Thread Jakub Wilk
There are some warnings while running tests: build/lib/dateutil/tz.py:910: ResourceWarning: unclosed file <_io.BufferedReader name='/usr/share/zoneinfo/EST5EDT'> build/lib/dateutil/tz.py:910: ResourceWarning: unclosed file <_io.BufferedReader name='/usr/share/zoneinfo/UTC'> build/lib/dateutil/t

Re: How do I add support for python3 to my package?

2012-04-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 10:35:04 AM Paul Elliott wrote: > On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 10:12:24 AM Barry Warsaw wrote: > > On Apr 18, 2012, at 03:09 AM, Paul Elliott wrote: > > >I am not a expert python packager. I am dubious about a bunch of cargo > > >cult packagers all writing seperate but

Re: How do I add support for python3 to my package?

2012-04-18 Thread Paul Elliott
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 10:12:24 AM Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Apr 18, 2012, at 03:09 AM, Paul Elliott wrote: > >I am not a expert python packager. I am dubious about a bunch of cargo > >cult packagers all writing seperate but similar debian/rules > >complications. > > That's why I wrote the st

Re: How do I add support for python3 to my package?

2012-04-18 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Apr 18, 2012, at 03:09 AM, Paul Elliott wrote: >I am not a expert python packager. I am dubious about a bunch of cargo cult >packagers all writing seperate but similar debian/rules complications. That's why I wrote the style guide; hopefully at least we'll converge on one set of (well-documen

Re: RFS: dparser-1.16-1 [ITP] -- a scannerless GLR parser generator

2012-04-18 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jakub Wilk , 2012-04-16, 23:35: * Markus Wanner , 2012-04-16, 07:45: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dparser/dparser_1.26-1.dsc One more thing: pyversions -vr debian/control could be (more conventionally and more succinctly) written as: pyversions -vr -- Jakub Wilk -- To

Re: How do I add support for python3 to my package?

2012-04-18 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Paul Elliott, 2012-04-18] > I am not a expert python packager. I am dubious about a bunch of cargo cult > packagers all writing seperate but similar debian/rules complications. > > It seems like one is creating a lot of debugging/maintainance problems. > > Why can not some expert that really kn

Re: How do I add support for python3 to my package?

2012-04-18 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Paul (2012.04.18_10:09:30_+0200) > I am not a expert python packager. I am dubious about a bunch of cargo cult > packagers all writing seperate but similar debian/rules complications. Indeed, it's messy and far from ideal. > Why can not some expert that really know what she is doing write the

Re: How do I add support for python3 to my package?

2012-04-18 Thread Paul Elliott
On Thursday, April 12, 2012 08:30:41 AM Barry Warsaw wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Apr 12, 2012, at 02:09 AM, Paul Elliott wrote: > >A recent review of my package asked me to consider making a python3 > >version. > > Excellent! One more down the road to Python 3 world domination. :) > > >But the res

Bug#668841: RFS: yp-svipc/0.13-1 [ITP] -- System V InterProcess Communication for Python/Yorick

2012-04-18 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-python@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yp-svipc" * Package name: yp-svipc Version : 0.13-1 Upstream Author : Matthieu Bec * URL : https://github.com/frigaut