Re: RFS: python3-dateutil

2012-04-14 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 14 April 2012 11:12, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Could you update the latter item? Yep, done. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caovn4qi4hvyeg2dqa

Re: pythonX.Y maintenance team

2012-04-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Saturday, April 14, 2012 05:12:54 PM Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > times when the only 'solution' available is a short term hack that's > > needed > > for Ubuntu's time based release schedule that isn't appropriate to > > Debian's > > approach of

Re: RFS: python3-dateutil

2012-04-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Thomas Kluyver , 2012-04-02, 21:41: Wouldn't it be better to update zoneinfo.gettz() tests to use tz.gettz(), instead of disabling them entirely? [...] All done. Thanks. But the changelog still reads: * Repackage source without binary parts * Remove tests that fail without said parts Could

Re: pythonX.Y maintenance team

2012-04-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > times when the only 'solution' available is a short term hack that's needed > for Ubuntu's time based release schedule that isn't appropriate to Debian's > approach of doing things right and releasing when ready. Why are short term hacks O