On 24 March 2012 22:41, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> I don't accept "it's dh_make's fault!" excuses, sorry. :P
I'm not aiming to make excuses - I'm suggesting that dh_make could be
updated to produce the preferred style of output, if that hasn't
already happened. I see Ben's just phrased this better than
Jakub Wilk writes:
> * Thomas Kluyver , 2012-03-24, 12:29:
> >> "debhelper (>= 8)" instead of "debhelper (>= 8.0.0)" would be more
> >> friendly to backporters.
> > Done. Note this is what the file created by dh_make has (although that
> > could have been updated in a newer version than I have).
* Thomas Kluyver , 2012-03-24, 12:29:
"debhelper (>= 8)" instead of "debhelper (>= 8.0.0)" would be more
friendly to backporters.
Done. Note this is what the file created by dh_make has (although that
could have been updated in a newer version than I have).
I don't accept "it's dh_make's fault
On 24 March 2012 21:21, Ben Finney wrote:
> That's what makes the most sense to me. Some DDs don't like it, some
> prefer it, and most will (IME) not mind very much either way.
>
> My advice: Do what you've done, and see what the particular sponsor
> prefers.
Thanks, Ben. I've reverted it to 2.0-
Thomas Kluyver writes:
> On 24 March 2012 10:59, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > Please merge the two changelog entries.
>
> Done. I thought I should bump the number if I'd published the package
> anywhere, evidently I was wrong about that.
That's what makes the most sense to me. Some DDs don't like it,
On 24 March 2012 13:16, Geoffroy Youri Berret wrote:
> In the worse case (non dfsg licence) you need to repack upstream to have
> a dfsg suffixed package.
I think it's just a tarball of the same data that's in the tzdata
package - in which case, it's public domain. I'll add it as a section
in the
Le 24/03/2012 13:29, Thomas Kluyver a écrit :
>> What is the license of zoneinfo-2011d.tar.gz ?
>
> The packaging deletes it, so I'd assumed it doesn't need license
> information. Upstream doesn't mention anything specific, and looking
> at python-dateutil, there's no license information for it th
Thanks Jakub and Geoffroy,
(below, Done = changes committed to SVN. I'll reupload to mentors shortly)
On 24 March 2012 10:59, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Please merge the two changelog entries.
Done. I thought I should bump the number if I'd published the package
anywhere, evidently I was wrong about t
Hi Thomas,
I'm not a DD, therefore I cannot sponsor your package, here is my review
nonetheless.
Le 24/03/2012 03:39, Thomas Kluyver a écrit :
> Hi all,
>[…]
>
> Package name: python3-dateutil
> Version : 2.0-2
> Upstream Author : Gustavo Niemeyer
> URL : http://labix.o
Please merge the two changelog entries.
"debhelper (>= 8)" instead of "debhelper (>= 8.0.0)" would be more
friendly to backporters.
Please add Vcs-* fields (and remove the commented-out ones, sigh...).
s/monday/Monday/ in the package description.
Lintian emits:
P: python3-dateutil source: un
10 matches
Mail list logo
