On 15 November 2011 23:49, Kay Hayen wrote:
> Hm, what about "nuitka-python" as a binary name of what is now Python, is
> that OK? It seems the readable variant.
>
nuitka-python is what I'd call it, from your description. I'm not actually
a Debian packager, though.
Thomas
Hello Nicolas,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:59:56PM +0100, Kay Hayen wrote:
Oh collective Debian-Python Brainpower, tell me a good name but
"nuitka" for said binary. :-)
Reading the doc I understand that "Python" == "Nuitka.py --execute".
Am I correct ?
It's "--exe" and "--exectute", but ye
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:59:56PM +0100, Kay Hayen wrote:
> Oh collective Debian-Python Brainpower, tell me a good name but
> "nuitka" for said binary. :-)
Reading the doc I understand that "Python" == "Nuitka.py --execute".
Am I correct ?
Maybe Python + nuitka --> nuitka + nuitka-ctl
O
Hello,
As I mentioned in the thread concerning Nuitka, I've been trying for a while
to get Shedskin packaged for Debian, and I've sent the occasional RFS to the
Mentors list, but I'd be interested to know if anyone is interested in taking
this work further and/or sponsoring it. Here's the Mento
Hello Nicolas,
you wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:50:13PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Paul Boddie, 2011-11-12, 15:08:
c) I renamed "Nuitka.py" to a "nuitka" binary. I am keeping the
drop-in replacement as "Python" though.
I don't think it's wise to call it "Python",
Agreed, this is bad
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:50:13PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Paul Boddie , 2011-11-12, 15:08:
> >>c) I renamed "Nuitka.py" to a "nuitka" binary. I am keeping the
> >>drop-in replacement as "Python" though.
> >I don't think it's wise to call it "Python",
>
> Agreed, this is bad idea.
+1
W
6 matches
Mail list logo
