On Saturday 12 November 2011 22:50:13 Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Paul Boddie , 2011-11-12, 15:08:
> >If Nuitka aims to be a Python alternative, shouldn't it use the
> >alternatives mechanism in Debian?
>
> We don't use alternatives for Python interpreters, for good reasons.
OK. I know of the alternativ
* Paul Boddie , 2011-11-12, 15:08:
c) I renamed "Nuitka.py" to a "nuitka" binary. I am keeping the
drop-in replacement as "Python" though.
I don't think it's wise to call it "Python",
Agreed, this is bad idea.
If Nuitka aims to be a Python alternative, shouldn't it use the
alternatives mecha
Hi Kay (2011.11.12_23:01:43_+0200)
> More or less stolen from "/usr/bin/hg" which does something similar.
> I have hooked distutils to modify the scripts and replace @LIBDIR@
> for the binary distributions.
I disabled that in mercurial in Debian. It caused a rather nasty bug:
http://bugs.debian.or
Hello Paul,
Am 12.11.2011 15:08, schrieb Paul Boddie:
On Saturday 12 November 2011 09:55:39 Kay Hayen wrote:
I created an ITP for Nuitka here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648489
I've been following Nuitka, and I think it's great to see how it has
progressed over time.
On Saturday 12 November 2011 09:55:39 Kay Hayen wrote:
>
> I created an ITP for Nuitka here:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648489
I've been following Nuitka, and I think it's great to see how it has
progressed over time. Since I've been trying to package Shedskin for Debian
Hello,
I created an ITP for Nuitka here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648489
I have followed your advice in as so far received, and made the
following things:
a) First of all, I added "setup.py" and distutils stuff to Nuitka,
something I had never done before.
b) To f
6 matches
Mail list logo
