Re: Two binary from one source - how?

2011-10-13 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2011-10-13 21:31, anatoly techtonik wrote: > There is a long standing bug in trac-bitten [1] to make a spin off a > bitten-slave package from the same source that will include just slave > client for running builds, which is independent of Trac [2]. Usually, > you can build bitten-slave with: >

Two binary from one source - how?

2011-10-13 Thread anatoly techtonik
There is a long standing bug in trac-bitten [1] to make a spin off a bitten-slave package from the same source that will include just slave client for running builds, which is independent of Trac [2]. Usually, you can build bitten-slave with: python setup.py --without-master install But how to sp

Re: Anybody to package new Bitten version?

2011-10-13 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Quoting "anatoly techtonik" : It's 9 months since the patch to upgrade trac-bitten was committed to Debian repository and it's not packaged yet. Can anybody release it? Problem is: I can't (currently) test new versions properly - no time. Second issue: I really want to have two packages: Master

Anybody to package new Bitten version?

2011-10-13 Thread anatoly techtonik
It's 9 months since the patch to upgrade trac-bitten was committed to Debian repository and it's not packaged yet. Can anybody release it? http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-apps/packages/trac-bitten/trunk/debian/changelog?r1=6417&r2=6416&pathrev=6417 -- anatoly t. On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 5

Re: Request for packaging - Nuitka the Python Compiler

2011-10-13 Thread Kay Hayen
Am 13.10.2011 09:24, schrieb Paul Wise: On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 09:18 +0200, Nicolas Chauvat wrote: If and only if you were to consider replacing SCons, take a look at waf that has many qualities. http://code.google.com/p/waf/ Please do not look at waf, it is worse than scons, which is why it w

Re: Request for packaging - Nuitka the Python Compiler

2011-10-13 Thread Nicolas Chauvat
Hi, Thank you Kay for Nuitka. I have not tried it, but I will since it looks interesting. On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:29:09AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > Currently I am just trying to be a good upstream. > > On that topic, we have a bunch of good links and some Debian-specific > information about

Re: Request for packaging - Nuitka the Python Compiler

2011-10-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 09:18 +0200, Nicolas Chauvat wrote: > If and only if you were to consider replacing SCons, take a look at > waf that has many qualities. http://code.google.com/p/waf/ Please do not look at waf, it is worse than scons, which is why it was removed from Debian. -- bye, pabs