Re: RFS: decoratortools

2011-05-31 Thread Daniele Tricoli
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 13:58:19 Jakub Wilk wrote: > On the other hand, ftp-masters are not fans of tiny packages: > http://bugs.debian.org/606411 Then, maybe, is better to preserve the actual situation... > s/virtual/transitional/? Of course. -- Daniele Tricoli 'Eriol' http://mornie.org s

Upstream looks for a proper way to build the packages by itself

2011-05-31 Thread Andriy Senkovych
Dear mentors, I'm an uploader of the buildbot and buildbot-slave Debian packages and a contributor to the buildbot project[1] itself. As you may wonder, buildbot is a distributed continious integration tool written in Python. And since this is a continious integration tool, it would be great if it

Re: RFS: decoratortools

2011-05-31 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Daniele Tricoli , 2011-05-31, 13:41: That said, I'm not a fan of package bundles like python-peak.util. If no one is against it, I can split python-peak.util into individual packages On the other hand, ftp-masters are not fans of tiny packages: http://bugs.debian.org/606411 and transform

Re: RFS: decoratortools

2011-05-31 Thread Daniele Tricoli
On Monday 30 May 2011 20:24:15 Jakub Wilk wrote: > That said, I'm not a fan of package bundles like python-peak.util. If no one is against it, I can split python-peak.util into individual packages and transform it into a virtual package. Kind regards, -- Daniele Tricoli 'Eriol' http://mornie