[Sandro Tosi, 2011-01-13]
> is this some sort of subliminal message that wheezy is planned to
> support only 2.7 ? :)
that's the plan (at least my plan), yes
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2010/10/msg00017.html
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer
www.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 15:33, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> (I will ask the same for modules when 2.7 will be
> the only supported Python 2.X version and thus the same will be true for
> Python public modules).
is this some sort of subliminal message that wheezy is planned to
support only 2.7 ? :)
C
On Jan 13, 2011, at 04:08 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>[Barry Warsaw, 2011-01-13]
>> Actually, I think dh_python2 *is* better because the symlinks aren't created
>> at install time, but instead are included in the package.
>
>we're talking about private modules here, python-support doesn't create
>
[Jakub Wilk, 2011-01-13]
> What about backportability? Do you plan to backport dh_python2 to lenny?
> (I doesn't sound straight-forward, if doable at all.)
didjvu will never be backported to Lenny as it will not be released with
Squeeze
but yes, with one small change (to workaround missing py_c
[Barry Warsaw, 2011-01-13]
> Actually, I think dh_python2 *is* better because the symlinks aren't created
> at install time, but instead are included in the package.
we're talking about private modules here, python-support doesn't create
symlinks for private modules
--
Piotr Ożarowski
* Piotr Ożarowski , 2011-01-13, 15:33:
didjvu 0.2.1-1 - initial release
consider using dh_python2 instead of python-support
Out of curiosity, how is dh_python2 better thant python-support for
Python applications? (It's a 97% honest question!)
It's not better¹ and it's not worse. I asked to
On Jan 13, 2011, at 03:33 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>[Jakub Wilk, 2011-01-13]
>> Out of curiosity, how is dh_python2 better thant python-support for
>> Python applications? (It's a 97% honest question!)
>
>It's not better¹ and it's not worse. I asked to consider it for NEW
>package because I wa
[Jakub Wilk, 2011-01-13]
> * Piotr Ożarowski , 2011-01-11, 11:09:
>>> I would like to refresh the RFS for the following packets:
>>>
>>> didjvu 0.2.1-1 - initial release
>>
>> consider using dh_python2 instead of python-support
>
> Out of curiosity, how is dh_python2 better thant python-su
Hi Bernd
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:03:32AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 01/10/2011 10:58 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >I initially filled it as ITP, but I'm more concentrating on packaging
> >other things, so I would like to ask, is someone of the Python
> >Application team interested to
* Piotr Ożarowski , 2011-01-11, 11:09:
I would like to refresh the RFS for the following packets:
didjvu 0.2.1-1 - initial release
consider using dh_python2 instead of python-support
Out of curiosity, how is dh_python2 better thant python-support for
Python applications? (It's a 97% ho
10 matches
Mail list logo
