Re: Untrusted search path vulnerabilities

2010-11-27 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Floris Bruynooghe , 2010-11-28, 00:06: So now that these have been filed, is there a consensus on what to do if only documentation is affected? How about, well, fixing it? :) It's not like correcting documentation is rocket science. In any case I don't think it's RC or warrants an upload

Re: Untrusted search path vulnerabilities

2010-11-27 Thread Floris Bruynooghe
[Sandro: sorry for the mistaken private reply] On 27 November 2010 22:50, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 14:50, Jakub Wilk wrote: >> * Sandro Tosi , 2010-11-17, 23:37: Any volunteers to file bugs? :) >>> >>> I'll do that tomorrow, if no-one beats me. >> >> Any news on tha

Re: Untrusted search path vulnerabilities

2010-11-27 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 00:13, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Sandro Tosi , 2010-11-27, 23:50: > > Any volunteers to file bugs? :) I'll do that tomorrow, if no-one beats me. >>> >>> Any news on that? :) >> >> FSVO "tomorrow": done ;) >> >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?t

Re: Untrusted search path vulnerabilities

2010-11-27 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Sandro Tosi , 2010-11-27, 23:50: Any volunteers to file bugs? :) I'll do that tomorrow, if no-one beats me. Any news on that? :) FSVO "tomorrow": done ;) http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pythonpath;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Thanks a bunch! Though I see somet

Re: Untrusted search path vulnerabilities

2010-11-27 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 14:50, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Sandro Tosi , 2010-11-17, 23:37: >>> >>> Any volunteers to file bugs? :) >> >> I'll do that tomorrow, if no-one beats me. > > Any news on that? :) FSVO "tomorrow": done ;) http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pythonpath;users=debia