On Jul 27, 2010, at 12:33 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>In sid there are two packages with python2.7-specific bytecompilation
>errors: mgltools-viewerframework and python-jaxml. Both packages do
>something like:
>
>import sys
>sys.__debug__ = something
>
>which is a syntax error in Python 2.7.
This one'
On Jul 30, 2010, at 07:55 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>[bump]
>
>Anybody?
I have little street cred to speak for DPMT, but I would be hesitant about
it. I personally have little Ruby or Lua experience and wouldn't know how to
fix problems in those bindings.
OTOH, I don't have a better suggestion. :(
[bump]
Anybody?
On Jul 27, 2010, at 1:37 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> So I recently uploaded python-libgearman into the svn repository, but bzed
> pointed out that it didn't build from the swig bindings, and so really wasn't
> acceptable to upload to Debian.
>
> I agree, and now I have a source p
* Jakub Wilk , 2010-07-27, 00:33:
In sid there are two packages with python2.7-specific bytecompilation
errors: mgltools-viewerframework and python-jaxml.
I've filed bugs against them:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org;tag=python2.7
--
Jakub Wilk
On Jul 30, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:23:05AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> True. I like separating my tests into submodules, and I don't
>> personally like in-docstring doctests, so I'm biased toward those
>> decisions.
>
>I'd say in-docstring doctests
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:23:05AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> True. I like separating my tests into submodules, and I don't personally like
> in-docstring doctests, so I'm biased toward those decisions.
I'd say in-docstring doctests are good at documentation rather than
extensive testing.
--
6 matches
Mail list logo
