On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> first of all: Barry, Yaroslav don't hijack threads :) this is about
yeap... sorry... welcome new thread
> testing platform only generates a bit of confusion. Don't get me
> wrong, it's an interesting topic, only discussed in the wrong thread.
cool -- lets
Hi,
first of all: Barry, Yaroslav don't hijack threads :) this is about
numpy problems, and mixing messages about a possible, future, common
testing platform only generates a bit of confusion. Don't get me
wrong, it's an interesting topic, only discussed in the wrong thread.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 a
Hi Barry,
While it is hot:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> In my copious spare time , I'm working on code, documentation, and
> infrastructure to make this the preferred way of testing Python modules and
> applications. You don't *have* to conform, but we'll put out big carrots for
>
On 27/07/10 08:54, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:48, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le mardi 27 juillet 2010 à 10:33 +0900, Shyouzou Sugitani a écrit :
>>> After upgrading from 2.17.0-2 to 2.17.0-3 I got an error
>>> "pygtk was not compiled with Numeric Python support".
>>>
>>> $ pyt
So I recently uploaded python-libgearman into the svn repository, but bzed
pointed out that it didn't build from the swig bindings, and so really wasn't
acceptable to upload to Debian.
I agree, and now I have a source package that builds from the upstream swig
sources, but this begs the questio
5 matches
Mail list logo
