Re: Bug#590525: python-gtk2: pygtk was not compiled with Numeric Python support

2010-07-26 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi, On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:48, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 27 juillet 2010 à 10:33 +0900, Shyouzou Sugitani a écrit : >> After upgrading from 2.17.0-2 to 2.17.0-3 I got an error >> "pygtk was not compiled with Numeric Python support". >> >> $ python >> >>> import gtk >> >>> pixbuf = gt

Re: Bug#590525: python-gtk2: pygtk was not compiled with Numeric Python support

2010-07-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 27 juillet 2010 à 10:33 +0900, Shyouzou Sugitani a écrit : > After upgrading from 2.17.0-2 to 2.17.0-3 I got an error > "pygtk was not compiled with Numeric Python support". > > $ python > >>> import gtk > >>> pixbuf = gtk.gdk.Pixbuf(gtk.gdk.COLORSPACE_RGB, True, 8, 100, 100) > >>> pixbuf

RFS: python-pyth

2010-07-26 Thread Daniele Tricoli
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor my package "python-pyth". It builds these binary packages: python-pyth - library to convert marked-up text between different formats The package appears to be lintian clean[¹]. The upload would fix these bugs: #590037. The package can be found on: - SVN

Re: Python 2.7 status on Ubuntu Maverick

2010-07-26 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Barry Warsaw , 2010-07-26, 15:38: Of course, this only helps with extension module packages, since as you know, any incompatibilities with pure-Python packages can't be determined until install time. One of my next steps is to create a Maverick VM and install as much of the Python rdeps as po

Re: Python 2.7 status on Ubuntu Maverick

2010-07-26 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 22:54, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Failure of python-numpy is related to Python 2.7. This bug seems to be fixed > in Numpy 1.4.1, so again Debian is not affected. 2.7 will be properly supported only in numpy 1.5 [1] but you can make 1.4.1 it works with it but some patches have to

Re: Numpy API change?

2010-07-26 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Sandro Tosi , 2010-07-26, 23:31: It looks like python-vigra, maintained by me, is affected by this ABI change too: it works with Numpy 1.4 when built with 1.3 but not the other way round. I'm going to use dh_numpy (I'll just dump it into ./debian/) to solve the problem for this particular pac

Re: Numpy API change?

2010-07-26 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Jakub, On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 23:13, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Jakub Wilk , 2010-07-22, 19:49: >> >> 3. Write dh_numpy (a working prototype attached) and start using it. > > Just FYI: > > It looks like python-vigra, maintained by me, is affected by this ABI change > too: it works with Numpy 1.4 w

Re: Numpy API change?

2010-07-26 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jakub Wilk , 2010-07-22, 19:49: 3. Write dh_numpy (a working prototype attached) and start using it. Just FYI: It looks like python-vigra, maintained by me, is affected by this ABI change too: it works with Numpy 1.4 when built with 1.3 but not the other way round. I'm going to use dh_nump

Re: Python 2.7 status on Ubuntu Maverick

2010-07-26 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Barry Warsaw , 2010-07-26, 15:38: https://launchpad.net/~pythoneers/+archive/py27stack4/+packages As you can see there are a few build failures here, but at least one of them is bogus I think[1]. I'm still evaluating the others and would appreciate any additional input or feedback you migh

Python 2.7 status on Ubuntu Maverick

2010-07-26 Thread Barry Warsaw
Having just returned from a platform rally in Prague, I thought I would update folks on the progress of enabling Python 2.7 as a supported -- but not default -- Python in Ubuntu Maverick (what will be 10.10). I'd also like to take this opportunity to solicit help in getting us to the point where w