On Apr 21, 2010, at 08:33 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>[Piotr Ożarowski, 2010-04-21]
>> should be easy to check (by creating 2 simple .py files and running
>> them using python2.7 from experimental). I'll check it later tonight.
>
>It's not enabled (fails only if I import absolute_import from
>__fu
Hi.
Rick Thomas (21/04/2010):
> I don't know how this can happen, but it definitely did happen.
> Enjoy!
The list of Arch: all packages merged into the Packages list for a
given architecture depends (!) on the build status of the related
Arch: any packages.
I can think of the following referenc
[Piotr Ożarowski, 2010-04-21]
> should be easy to check (by creating 2 simple .py files and running
> them using python2.7 from experimental). I'll check it later tonight.
It's not enabled (fails only if I import absolute_import from
__future__)
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian G
On Apr 21, 2010, at 11:41 AM, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Rick Thomas
wrote:
The reason seems to be that python-twisted-core version 10.0.0-3 is
available on amd64 Sid, but on i386 Sid it's only available at
version
10.0.0-2 .
Maybe it needs to be rebuilt fo
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 08:58:53AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 07:41, Rick Thomas wrote:
> > The reason seems to be that python-twisted-core version 10.0.0-3 is
> > available on amd64 Sid, but on i386 Sid it's only available at version
> > 10.0.0-2 .
> >
> > Maybe it needs
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
> The reason seems to be that python-twisted-core version 10.0.0-3 is
> available on amd64 Sid, but on i386 Sid it's only available at version
> 10.0.0-2 .
>
> Maybe it needs to be rebuilt for i386 ?
python-twisted-core is an Arch: all package,
El Mar 20 Abr 2010, C.J. Adams-Collier escribió:
> I'm able to build from svn with svn-buildpackage:
>
> svn://svn.debian.org/svn/python-modules/packages/nltk/trunk
>
> Could someone do a quick policy audit and point me toward the policy
> docs so I can address any issues that exist?
Is this versi
[Barry Warsaw, 2010-04-21]
> >did you hear about relative imports in 2.7? (enormous transition for us)
>
> Are you sure about this? Despite what PEP 328 says, I'm not sure that change
> actually happened. I can find no reference to this change in Misc/NEWS on
> trunk, nor in the What's New for P
On Apr 21, 2010, at 02:43 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>> Moreover AFAICT 2.7 is the most compatible-with-the-previous-version
>> Python release in the last 16 years
>
>did you hear about relative imports in 2.7? (enormous transition for us)
Are you sure about this? Despite what PEP 328 says, I'm
> Moreover AFAICT 2.7 is the most compatible-with-the-previous-version
> Python release in the last 16 years
did you hear about relative imports in 2.7? (enormous transition for us)
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer
www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 07:41, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Apr 20, 2010, at 2:30 AM, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
>
>> If I was you I would start by finding out why python-twisted-core is not
>> getting upgraded to the latest version that's in the repos and so on, with a
>> little investigating I'm
11 matches
Mail list logo
