On Apr 20, 2010, at 2:30 AM, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
If I was you I would start by finding out why python-twisted-core is
not getting upgraded to the latest version that's in the repos and
so on, with a little investigating I'm sure you will find what has
broken your system, it may help to us
* 2010-04-21 01:17, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> I think Fabio (kob...@d.o) also wanted to / is working on a backport,
> might make sense to co-maintain that with him. CCed him :)
I'm definitely interested in co-maintaining the backport (and using my own
backport in production already). I'll have a look
On 21/04/10 05:01, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Who is your target audience? If you want this document to be read by
packaging newbies, then this document is terribly incomplete.
That, I believe, would be because of my very limited knowledge in the
field. Although I may not have explicitly said this initia
* Umang Varma , 2010-04-18, 08:30:
My general impression is that it's yet another (very) bad piece of
documentation. Feel free to ignore my opinion however, as I'm
already prejudiced. :P
It's hard to ignore your opinion (or for that matter, that of any DD
here). When you say very bad, it is cle
On 04/01/2010 10:27 AM, Toni Mueller wrote:
> I'm sorry to say that I forgot to upload my semi-broken attempts - just
> "fixed" it - maybe they still provide a useful starting point:
>
>> http://people.debian.org/~toni/python2.6/
>
>
> Please send feedback my way!
I think Fabio (kob...@d.o) al
[Barry Warsaw, 2010-04-20]
> If 10.10 includes
> only Python 2.7, then sure, we'll only back port to that version.
why do you want to backport it to 2.X for a single python2.x package?
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer
www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc
[Barry Warsaw, 2010-04-20]
> On Apr 20, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>
> >[Omer Zak, 2010-04-20]
> >> My take of the situation:
> >> Yes, please backport PEP 3147 to at least Python 2.7.
> >> The rationale: we'll need to support both Python 2.x and Python 3.x for
> >> several years, a
On Monday, April 19, 2010 05:53:05 pm Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Apologies for the cross-post, but I want to make sure that everyone who
> cares about Python on both Debian and Ubuntu gets a chance to weigh in.
>
> On Friday, Guido approved and I landed the implementation of PEP 3147 on
> the py3k trun
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 15:39 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2010, at 06:50 AM, Omer Zak wrote:
>
> >My take of the situation:
> >Yes, please backport PEP 3147 to at least Python 2.7.
> >The rationale: we'll need to support both Python 2.x and Python 3.x for
> >several years, and it will be
On Apr 20, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>[Omer Zak, 2010-04-20]
>> My take of the situation:
>> Yes, please backport PEP 3147 to at least Python 2.7.
>> The rationale: we'll need to support both Python 2.x and Python 3.x for
>> several years, and it will be nice if the same library pa
On Apr 20, 2010, at 06:50 AM, Omer Zak wrote:
>My take of the situation:
>Yes, please backport PEP 3147 to at least Python 2.7.
>The rationale: we'll need to support both Python 2.x and Python 3.x for
>several years, and it will be nice if the same library package can be
>made to support both 2.x
* C.J. Adams-Collier , 2010-04-20, 09:02:
It is already being worked on. The package is being hosted on
alioth and seems to build for me. I don't know what is keeping it
from being rfs'd. Maybe robin knows?
are you talking about Robin Munn? I'm not sure if he can sponsor (is
he DD?). I can
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 10:48 -0300, Luciano Bello wrote:
> El Jue 08 Abr 2010, Luciano Bello escribió:
> > El Mié 07 Abr 2010, C.J. Adams-Collier escribió:
> > > It is already being worked on. The package is being hosted on alioth and
> > > seems to build for me. I don't know what is keeping it fr
[Omer Zak, 2010-04-20]
> My take of the situation:
> Yes, please backport PEP 3147 to at least Python 2.7.
> The rationale: we'll need to support both Python 2.x and Python 3.x for
> several years, and it will be nice if the same library package can be
> made to support both 2.x and 3.x.
you canno
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:46:48 -0500 Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> But it would be nice to see Python 2.7 in Debian soon. :-)
>
It's available in experimental (not the latest beta, though). But
indeed it would be great to have the 2.6->2.7 transition started a
little earlier than the 2.5->2.6 one :-)
p
15 matches
Mail list logo
