On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 00:32, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Sandro Tosi (17/02/2010):
>> No, don't tell me it's because of the first round of binNMUs: either
>> someone's going to fix them or they will be FTBFS with 2.6 as
>> default, and better explicit than implicit (how many people look at
>> thos
Sandro Tosi (17/02/2010):
> No, don't tell me it's because of the first round of binNMUs: either
> someone's going to fix them or they will be FTBFS with 2.6 as
> default, and better explicit than implicit (how many people look at
> those binNMUs except us?).
While 2.5 is the default, one can use
* Bernd Zeimetz , 2010-02-16, 23:25:
I start to wonder how they make a difference betweek py2.6's json and
python-json, if its necessary at all for anyjson.
It doesn't deal very well... Here's what happens in a clean chroot with
only python-anyjson and python-json installed:
import anyjson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes, again.
Why the default Python interpreter is still 2.5 and not 2.6?
No, don't tell me it's because of the first round of binNMUs: either
someone's going to fix them or they will be FTBFS with 2.6 as default,
and better explicit than implicit (ho
Alexandre Quessy wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> It seems like python-json should either be renamed of deprecated.
>
> Meanwhile, all the Python application and modules that use JSON should
> be careful when importing the json module. Here's how I do it. (see the
> code extract below)
>
The other opti
5 matches
Mail list logo
