Re: python2.6 vs python-json

On Feb 14, 2010, at 09:18 AM, Paul Wise wrote: >Unless they can be convinced to undo that, python-json is clearly at a Very unlikely that will happen. -Barry signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: python2.6 vs python-json

So basically, Python upstream hijacked a part of the import namespace. Unless they can be convinced to undo that, python-json is clearly at a disadvantage and future JSON consuming Python code will likely use the Python json module since it comes with Python. Therefore python-json needs to be remov

python2.6 vs python-json

There are currently two packages providing Python modules named 'json': python2.6 and python-json. Unfortunately, those module are not API-compatible. Here is my brief analysis of reverse-dependencies of python-json: - w3af-console depends on python-json and relies on its particular API. That

Re: RFS: django-lean

* Elliot Murphy , 2010-02-06, 19:02: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "django-lean". * Package name: django-lean Version : 0.1-1 Upstream Author : Akoha, Inc. * URL : http://bitbucket.org/akoha/django-lean/wiki/Home * License : BSD Sect