Hi Cyril & others,
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 02:15, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yaroslav Halchenko managed[1] to piss me off so badly that I'm not
> sure I want to have anything to do with python-{networkx,pygraphviz}
Sorry to read that.
> anymore. It would be nice to see some python-savvy f
Umang writes:
> What I am talking about is the upstream tarball that, when extracted
> into a directory, can run without being installed using distutils.
If the package is designed to be installed by distutils, it seems obtuse
to expect it to work without using distutils. The point of distutils
On 30/01/10 09:04, Ben Finney wrote:
As for getting access to ‘foolib’ for import: you need to make sure it's
on the import path somehow.
* For a library of general use, install it to the Python site packages.
You can then write your application as just one of an arbitrary number
of applic
Umang writes:
> One alternative that I can think of is:
>
> scripts/foo
> foo/
> foo/__init__.py
> ...
This is what I generally do, except I follow Unix convention and use the
directory name ‘bin’ for a directory containing executable programs.
> Here I don't understand how I co
On Sat, 2010-30-01 at 08:14 +0530, Umang wrote:
> What is the best directory structure for a python application?
>
> If I have a package called foo that installs a script called foo and
> a
> package called foo, this is what I would do:
>
> foopython script
>
Hello everyone,
I've searched the archives of this list but haven't found a post about
directory structure that I remember reading. So I'm going to ask the
question again.
What is the best directory structure for a python application?
If I have a package called foo that installs a script cal
Cyril,
I am really sorry that a waste of my time in preparing NMU and finding
possible objective reasons toward having an up to date package in Debian
pissed you off. I do want and need, indeed, to see python-networkx in a
good shape in Debian for the upcoming release and willing to adopt the
pa
Hi,
Yaroslav Halchenko managed[1] to piss me off so badly that I'm not
sure I want to have anything to do with python-{networkx,pygraphviz}
anymore. It would be nice to see some python-savvy folks take care of
it from now on.
1. See #565319 for reference.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description
* replace python-zopeinterface with python-zope.interface in Depends
* please fix lintian warnings:
W: foolscap source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 0.5.0+dfsg-1
W: foolscap source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
use team name as last updater to fix these two ^
W: foolscap source: de
Simon McVittie ha scritto:
> ... and for those who care about FTBFSs, the binNMUs of pygtk are also all
> failing (either due to #548211 or not waiting for python2.6-gobject to be
> available), which could stall this transition fairly badly. I'm sure the GNOME
> team would appreciate help with that
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:15:43AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> I was under the impression that the ‘#debian-python’ channel was a
> resource for use equally by anyone for discussion of maintaining Python
> packages in Debian. When did it become an in-group-versus-out-group club
> house, with credent
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 14:15, Ben Finney wrote:
> Sandro Tosi writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 03:08, Ben Finney wrote:
>> > Tristan Seligmann writes:
>> >
>> >> Are you even in the channel?
>> >
>> > Often, yes.
>>
>> Let the people (sponsoree & sponsors) who use that "tracker" decide
>>
Sandro Tosi writes:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 03:08, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Tristan Seligmann writes:
> >
> >> Are you even in the channel?
> >
> > Often, yes.
>
> Let the people (sponsoree & sponsors) who use that "tracker" decide
> what to use for it (you decided to not maintain your packages
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 00:47, Ben Finney wrote:
> writes:
>
>> Today I have switched python-whisper to use python-support instead of
>> python-central
> […]
>
> Be aware that, for an package that was *already* in Debian, you would
> need to modify your maintainer scripts to clean up after the mes
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 03:08, Ben Finney wrote:
> Tristan Seligmann writes:
>
>> Are you even in the channel?
>
> Often, yes.
>
>> The topic of the channel seems like a perfectly reasonable place for
>> this kind of list, too, so I'm not sure why you object to it so
>> strongly.
>
> I would thin
Am Donnerstag, den 28.01.2010, 07:10 -0500 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> > Scott Kitterman (17/12/2009):
> >> I believe that we are getting close to uploading Python 2.6 to
> >> Unstable and dropping Python 2.4 as a supported Python version. If
> >> we finish preparations in the next week, are there
16 matches
Mail list logo
