anatoly techtonik writes:
> I do not argue. I just want to say that for people with Python
> background this information should be structured in different manner
> omitting various irrelevant and confusing details.
If you feel that should be done, you're welcome to devote resources to
help it ha
>> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
>> >
>> > People who are creating/maintaining packages should start by reading
>> > the general packaging documentation, which explains these.
>>
>> Python package maintainers do not need to learn all that irrelevant C
>> stuff they have no id
Le mardi 29 décembre 2009 à 23:38 +0200, anatoly techtonik a écrit :
> > all: Package works on all architectures without (re-) compilation,
> > e.g. a program written in Python
> >
> > any: Package needs e.g. compilation, but will work on any
> > architecture, e.g. a library for Python, but
anatoly techtonik writes:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
> >
> > People who are creating/maintaining packages should start by reading
> > the general packaging documentation, which explains these.
>
> Python package maintainers do not need to learn all that irrelevant C
>
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
>
> People who are creating/maintaining packages should start by reading the
> general packaging documentation, which explains these.
Python package maintainers do not need to learn all that irrelevant C
stuff they have no idea about. They need
5 matches
Mail list logo
