Bug#562904: adonthell ftbfs on armel

2009-12-28 Thread peter green
package: adonthell version: 0.3.5-4 severity: serious x-debbugs-cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org During the run up to the lenny release python 2.5 was made the default and this made adonthell FTBFS on arm(el) with "Fatal Python error: exceptions bootstrapping error." (http://bugs.debian.org/

Re: Python Bindings for MLT

2009-12-28 Thread Jonathan Thomas
I have figured out the answer to my question. Python-support correctly adds my folder and files to the Python path. This changes the way I need to import the python module from >> import mlt to >> import mlt-python.mlt However, "mlt-python" does not appear to be a valid module name for Python. I

Re: Trac wrong plugin names.

2009-12-28 Thread Christoph Egger
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 09:38:26AM +0200, anatoly techtonik wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 3:34 AM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > > >> Now I still have > >> AccountManager named "urwid" in Trac Admin panel, but I do not even > >> want to repeat this awful SSH experience. > > > > I have the same p

Re: Python Bindings for MLT

2009-12-28 Thread Jonathan Thomas
Jakub, Thanks for the advice. I have removed the postinst script and the DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_ARGS_ALL line. I have also contacted the MLT packagers, but I'm not confident they will include the Python bindings in their packages. Here is a dumb question. After installing the DEB file, it moves all

Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3

2009-12-28 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Quoting "anatoly techtonik" : Then we should also patch "trac-admin deploy" command so that it create symlinks to static resources instead of copies to update user environments to latest jQuery automaically. I don't remember, I ever used "trac-admin deploy", and I wonder how useful it is. It sa

Re: Unit tests

2009-12-28 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 19:11, Guy Hulbert wrote: > On Sat, 2009-26-12 at 17:13 +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote: >> Quoting "anatoly techtonik" : >> If unit tests were in the package, reportbug could automatically >> run them on a bug report. Does someone do this already, maybe? > > Can reportbug b