anatoly techtonik schrieb:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Adam wrote:
>> This is a topic for debian-legal not debian-pyhton. Discuss it with them
>> (after looking at the archive), as they are the experts. If there are
>> problems (= results) that can be brought here again.
>
> The point is t
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Adam wrote:
> This is a topic for debian-legal not debian-pyhton. Discuss it with them
> (after looking at the archive), as they are the experts. If there are
> problems (= results) that can be brought here again.
The point is to make Python Policy clear without a
> Hello,
>
> The policy is under GPL license which is kind of ridiculous to prevent
> citing Debian Policy in private talks. I imagine people discussing
> "those folks at Debian. Have you heard - they've changed you-know-what
> to make packaging easier". =)
>
> Is there any license that more clearl
> I wouldn't go so far and see documentation as software. Apart from that
> I agree that it is important to clarify what one can do with this
> documentation (quote, modify, redistribute, etc.) and under which rules
> this has to happen. For example, when I quote a paragraph of the
> documentation
Omer Zak schrieb:
> On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 14:27 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> Ben Finney schrieb:
>>> anatoly techtonik writes:
>>>
The policy is under GPL license which is kind of ridiculous to prevent
citing Debian Policy in private talks.
>>> Why is it ridiculous? Is it any more ri
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 14:27 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Ben Finney schrieb:
> > anatoly techtonik writes:
> >
> >> The policy is under GPL license which is kind of ridiculous to prevent
> >> citing Debian Policy in private talks.
> >
> > Why is it ridiculous? Is it any more ridiculous to put
Ben Finney schrieb:
> anatoly techtonik writes:
>
>> The policy is under GPL license which is kind of ridiculous to prevent
>> citing Debian Policy in private talks.
>
> Why is it ridiculous? Is it any more ridiculous to put a policy document
> under GPL than any other document?
Quoting the sec
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>
>> The policy is under GPL license which is kind of ridiculous to prevent
>> citing Debian Policy in private talks.
>
> Why is it ridiculous? Is it any more ridiculous to put a policy document
> under GPL than any other document?
It is in the
anatoly techtonik writes:
> The policy is under GPL license which is kind of ridiculous to prevent
> citing Debian Policy in private talks.
Why is it ridiculous? Is it any more ridiculous to put a policy document
under GPL than any other document?
> I imagine people discussing "those folks at D
Resent: I've sent the message below to debian-python@, but it hits the
100 kB size limit; instead, please consult the git branch at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=users/lool/python-defaults.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/current-practices-v2
Hi
This a revised patchset with updates to addres
Hello,
The policy is under GPL license which is kind of ridiculous to prevent
citing Debian Policy in private talks. I imagine people discussing
"those folks at Debian. Have you heard - they've changed you-know-what
to make packaging easier". =)
Is there any license that more clearly states reaso
11 matches
Mail list logo
