Re: Request for review/sponsorship of python-lzma

2009-11-23 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:52:19AM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Other than that, I don't really think there's much to add; I'm just > hoping someone else might suggest what to do about the > ${python:Depends} expanding to python (>= 2.6) issue; if people can > suggest a workaround, then we can upl

Re: Request for review/sponsorship of python-lzma

2009-11-23 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:43:59AM -0500, Richard Darst wrote: > I removed the extra non-DEP5 stuff at the top, and tried to tighten it > up to strictly match what it says. There were some quirks, such as > the required "Format-Specification" field not being present in any > examples... I think t

Re: Request for review/sponsorship of python-lzma

2009-11-23 Thread Richard Darst
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 06:58:07PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Richard Darst writes: > > > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:02:23AM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > > debian/copyright: > > > * Licensed under LGPLv3+ > > > * Please add license headers too. > > The header of a DEP 5 copyright file doesn't