On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> (I am reading this to mean “the reference version of the Debian Python
> policy is in the python-defaults package”.)
>
> Okay. Clearly one way for this to improve would be for some of those bug
> reports to be responded to by the maintainer.
>
>
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le lundi 02 novembre 2009 à 21:22 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
> > Is there a silent Debian Python policy drafter out there who would
> > like to step forward? Or is this work now moribund?
>
> Bug reports concerning the Python policy have been silently ignored.
> I’m a
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:02:21 +0100 Josselin Mouette wrote:
>Le lundi 02 novembre 2009 à 21:22 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
>> Is there a silent Debian Python policy drafter out there who would like
>> to step forward? Or is this work now moribund?
>
>Bug reports concerning the Python policy have b
Hi Matthias,
You uploaded new python-central package that fixed one indentation error
in pycentral.py (which is ok, this bug had Severity=important in BTS).
Since my NMU of python-central was still waiting in DELAYED (queue was
disabled by ftpmasters) at that time, it didn't make it into unstable.
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le lundi 02 novembre 2009 à 21:22 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
> > Is there a silent Debian Python policy drafter out there who would
> > like to step forward? Or is this work now moribund?
>
> Bug reports concerning the Python policy have been silently ignored.
> I’m a
Le lundi 02 novembre 2009 à 21:22 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
> Is there a silent Debian Python policy drafter out there who would like
> to step forward? Or is this work now moribund?
Bug reports concerning the Python policy have been silently ignored. I’m
afraid this will last as long as the re
6 matches
Mail list logo
