On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> If there are no objections, I will submit a MBF for those 75 packages in
> a few days.
Go ahead, we have waited too much for python 2.6 already.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Yup this is a mail bomb - sign on with Greenpeace to help stop climate
change. You'll win a planet!
I've just Signed On with thousands of other Kiwis calling for urgent action
on climate change and I think you should too!
Please click here and join me:
http://www.signon.org.nz/invite/accept/M
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Therefore, a number of packages have to be fixed before they can work
> with python2.6. Practically speaking, this is the only thing that
> prevents python2.6 from entering unstable. This is a first attempt at
> listing packages needing to be fixed.
Thank you for this
Le vendredi 18 septembre 2009 à 21:18 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> * 246 packages don’t, but should work as well provided that we
> ensure python-central is fixed.
I forgot to explain how exactly it needs to be fixed.
> * python-central needs a NMU to
> handle /usr/lib/py
Twas brillig at 21:18:16 18.09.2009 UTC+02 when j...@debian.org did gyre and
gimble:
JM> Mikhail Gusarov
JM>python-pytils
Fixed and passed to Piotr for sponsoring.
--
http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/
pgpIJha5KBPcs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
starting from Python 2.6, the Debian packages look for modules in a
different directory: /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages instead
of /usr/lib/python2.X/site-packages. This is handled transparently by
python-central and python-support, but at install time, distutils (the
thingy behind “python s
Hi Alexandre & others,
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 10:21, Alexandre Fayolle
wrote:
> The problem I can see with removing blindly from the postinst is that
> potentially you're going to delete files belonging to other packages (e.g.
> older packages installed from Logilab's Debian repositories).
The
7 matches
Mail list logo
