Re: Developer workflow and DVCS

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 23:00, Ben Finney wrote: > Sandro Tosi writes: > >> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:21, Ben Finney wrote: >> > I see this discussion focussing on Subversion versus Git; I wish >> > with this message to point out that's a false dichotomy, as not >> > all DVCSen are necessarily

Re: Developer workflow and DVCS

David Cournapeau writes: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Ben Finney > wrote: > > > > This issue is avoidable if the repository is a Bazaar one: > > But what does it solve ? The main problem with downloading the whole > history is the time taken. The only way to know the relative speed >

Re: Developer workflow and DVCS

Sandro Tosi writes: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:21, Ben Finney wrote: > > I see this discussion focussing on Subversion versus Git; I wish > > with this message to point out that's a false dichotomy, as not > > all DVCSen are necessarily like Git. > > Wanna revamp it? Revamp what? I don't kno

Re: Leaving DPMT?

Piotr Ożarowski (26/02/2009): > > Now, question: should I keep DPMT in Uploaders, or drop it? > > please remove it, one exception will lead to other requests and I just > love grep -r :-P OK, did so. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Developer workflow and DVCS (was: Leaving DPMT?)

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Ben Finney wrote: > This issue is avoidable if the repository is a Bazaar one: But what does it solve ? The main problem with downloading the whole history is the time taken. The only way to know the relative speed is to measure; in my experience, with a git se

Re: Developer workflow and DVCS (was: Leaving DPMT?)

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:21, Ben Finney wrote: > [re-sending as a followup to an older thread] > > I see this discussion focussing on Subversion versus Git; I wish with > this message to point out that's a false dichotomy, as not all DVCSen > are necessarily like Git. Wanna revamp it? then here