Re: Major update of python-support

2009-02-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 18 février 2009 à 23:55 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > However I wish I could be so sure about building packages, but the > metadata format has changed so you can expect some big failures. I have > used a few sample packages during my testing, but this is far from > enough. I have

Bug#517308: python-syck: lacks a python-support dependency

2009-02-26 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Package: python-syck Version: 0.61.2-1 Severity: serious The package uses python-support but does not depend on it. The dependency should be auto-generated in a substvar, you just have to add the proper substvar. Note: the package is unmaintained, someone from the python team should probably take

Re: Leaving DPMT?

2009-02-26 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Ondrej Certik wrote: > Currently I think Sandro is the last major contributor for DPMT who > wants to stay in svn. I don't think I count as major contributor, but I'm distrustful about changing too. Emilio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Leaving DPMT?

2009-02-26 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > Hi, > > [Cyril Brulebois, 2009-02-26] >> That's why I'm planning to move python-{networkx,pygraphviz} out of >> DPMT's svn and move them to collab-maint's set of git repositories. >> >> Now, question: should I keep DPMT in Uploaders, or dr

Re: Leaving DPMT?

2009-02-26 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
Hi, [Cyril Brulebois, 2009-02-26] > That's why I'm planning to move python-{networkx,pygraphviz} out of > DPMT's svn and move them to collab-maint's set of git repositories. > > Now, question: should I keep DPMT in Uploaders, or drop it? please remove it, one exception will lead to other request

Leaving DPMT?

2009-02-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hello. There's no f* way in hell I'm gonna keep using SVN. (That's not a troll, a flame, whatever. Just a statement.) That's why I'm planning to move python-{networkx,pygraphviz} out of DPMT's svn and move them to collab-maint's set of git repositories. Now, question: should I keep DPMT in Uploa

Re: Removing w32 specific Python code from a package

2009-02-26 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Stephan Peijnik [Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:46:58 +0100]: > Now as python-pyglet needs to be repacked because it is not entirely > free anyways I thought I could get rid of this problem by simply > removing the w32-specifics when repackaging the dfsg version of the > tarball. What about just not insta

Removing w32 specific Python code from a package

2009-02-26 Thread Stephan Peijnik
Hello debian-python and DPMT, I have just noticed that a bug against one of the packages I help maintaining was reported [0] over at Launchpad that is caused by w32-specific code shipping with my package (python-pyglet). Now as python-pyglet needs to be repacked because it is not entirely free an