On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:50:36AM +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:24:47AM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:17:11PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > > Ondrej Certik writes:
>
> > > > I am unhappy that unstable gets frozen for such a long time, but I
Steve Langasek writes:
> It's not necessary to freeze unstable when preparing to release
> testing; this is a significant reason why testing exists as a
> separate suite.
That's exactly what I thought; I'm glad to see a member of the release
team reassert it.
> So in fact, unstable is *not* fro
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:24:47AM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:17:11PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Ondrej Certik writes:
> > > I am unhappy that unstable gets frozen for such a long time, but I
> > > understand that with the current setup (e.g. unstable, testing, ..)
Ben Finney (06/02/2009):
> I'm unhappy about it too, but I don't understand it. Where can I find
> an explanation for the necessity of freezing ‘unstable’ when preparing
> to release ‘testing’?
For more than verbose explanations, see -devel@ a few weeks ago,
starting at <200812160703.00258.russ..
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:17:11PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Ondrej Certik writes:
>
> > I am unhappy that unstable gets frozen for such a long time, but I
> > understand that with the current setup (e.g. unstable, testing, ..),
> > there is probably no other way.
>
> I'm unhappy about it too,
Ondrej Certik writes:
> I am unhappy that unstable gets frozen for such a long time, but I
> understand that with the current setup (e.g. unstable, testing, ..),
> there is probably no other way.
I'm unhappy about it too, but I don't understand it. Where can I find
an explanation for the necessi
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Ondrej Certik (05/02/2009):
>> Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got another email from a
>> Ubuntu user that he will rather consider compiling it for Ubuntu's PPA
>> himself, because he cannot use debian experimental. Of course.
Ondrej Certik (05/02/2009):
> Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got another email from a
> Ubuntu user that he will rather consider compiling it for Ubuntu's PPA
> himself, because he cannot use debian experimental. Of course.
>
> So he needs to invest his time in the package, I need t
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 17:21, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> 3) upload to experimental
>> 3a) keep the sphinx docs (sphinx is in experimental)
>
> I'd recommends this.
Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got another email from a
Ubuntu user
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009, Christopher Lunsford wrote:
> Dear Debian-Python,
>
> I am looking for some peer reviews on my package "charm", and possibly a
> mentor.
>
> Package name: charm
> Version : 1.9.1-1
> Upstream Author : Lydia Leong
> URL : http://ljcharm.sourc
[Christopher Lunsford, 2009-02-05]
> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/charm/charm_1.9.1-1.dsc
* PAPT is in Maintainer field, join PAPT and inject the package into our repo
* python-feedparser is missing in Recommends (Depends?)
* add "${misc:Depends}" to Depends
* no need to bui
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 17:21, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> 3) upload to experimental
> 3a) keep the sphinx docs (sphinx is in experimental)
I'd recommends this.
Cheers,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org
>> > hence no reason to allow for a transition to testing. Moreover, I
>> > promise that pymvpa will not attempt such thing ;-)
>>
>> What about Sphinx 0.4.3? Does it mean we will not try to unblock it?
>
> Sphinx 0.4.3 is the classic example: It causes more trouble than it
> fixed. For example try
Dear Debian-Python,
I am looking for some peer reviews on my package "charm", and possibly a mentor.
Package name: charm
Version : 1.9.1-1
Upstream Author : Lydia Leong
URL : http://ljcharm.sourceforge.net/
License : GPLv2
Section : web
It bui
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 23:16, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [please CC me or debian-pyt...@l.d.o as I didn't subscribe this bug]
>
> * 1.6 is mentioned in bug #504080, is .dsc available somewhere?
> * it's "Architecture: all" package, not "any", or did I miss
> something? * please merge patches 01
15 matches
Mail list logo
