Guy Hulbert wrote:
On Sat, 2008-27-12 at 13:41 -0800, andmalc wrote:
I don't think an official Debian package will be created in
experimental until 3.01 is out.
What I'm really missing is at what URL I could discover the "official"
state of things. I couldn't find anything at "python-
On Sat, 2008-27-12 at 13:41 -0800, andmalc wrote:
> On Dec 13, 9:50 am, Guy Hulbert wrote:
[snip]
wow! ... ;-)
> I don't think an official Debian package will be created in
> experimental until 3.01 is out.
What I'm really missing is at what URL I could discover the "official"
state of things.
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 22:12, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> I cannot build it as I have currently access to i386 arch. only
> (and libtokyocabinet-dev is available for amd64 only),
>
> Please ping me (in private) when libtokyocabinet will be available for
> i386 or next week (I will be back home then)
* Piotr Ożarowski [Sat, 27 Dec 2008 23:08:25 +0100]:
> $ dget -x
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/python3.0/3.0-0ubuntu1/+files/python3.0_3.0-0ubuntu1.dsc
> $ cd python*
> $ debuild
JFTR, the Ubuntu jaunty binaries work well in unstable. There are also
metapackages available, python
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [andmalc, 2008-12-27 23:00]
>> I'd appreciate a package, if only to play with and not for
>> production.
>
> $ dget -x
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/python3.0/3.0-0ubuntu1/+files/python3.0_3.0-0ubuntu1.dsc
> $ cd python*
>
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [andmalc, 2008-12-27 23:00]
>> I'd appreciate a package, if only to play with and not for
>> production.
>
> $ dget -x
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/python3.0/3.0-0ubuntu1/+files/python3.0_3.0-0ubuntu1.dsc
> $ cd python*
>
[andmalc, 2008-12-27 23:00]
> I'd appreciate a package, if only to play with and not for
> production.
$ dget -x
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/python3.0/3.0-0ubuntu1/+files/python3.0_3.0-0ubuntu1.dsc
$ cd python*
$ debuild
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.d
On Dec 13, 9:50 am, Guy Hulbert wrote:
...
> Can anyone fill me in on what's up. I think I saw 2.6 for sid in the
> package thingummy ... I may have a little time to try building a 3.0
> package if there's any interest.
>
I'd appreciate a package, if only to play with and not for
production.
I
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 09:00:40PM +, b...@bc-bd.org wrote:
> I have been maintaining revelation in the past, a GNOME2 Password manager. I
> will most likely orphan this package because:
>
> - I no longer use revelation
> - I don't have a sponsor right now
> - Upstream is di
On 27 Dec, 2008, at 5:48 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
Built on amd64 and it builds fine, even package contents it's ok; my
only concern is about depending on python-all-dbg for -dbg package.
I'm not sure what the alternative to that would be.
Vernon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ.
10 matches
Mail list logo