Re: Need help with revelation

On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:00:40 + b...@bc-bd.org wrote: >... >Simply removing the package may be a bad idea, as people who are using >revelation will then no longer be able to access their password lists. >... Removing the package from the archive won't remove it from installed systems. If it's

Need help with revelation

Hello debian-python, I have been maintaining revelation in the past, a GNOME2 Password manager. I will most likely orphan this package because: - I no longer use revelation - I don't have a sponsor right now - Upstream is discontinued since, Tuesday 16. January 2007 11:44

Re: [RFR] urlwatch

[Franck Joncourt, 2008-12-19 21:21] > >> /usr/share/urlwatch/examples/hooks.py.example > >> /usr/share/urlwatch/examples/urls.txt.example > > > > how about installing these in /usr/share/doc/urlwatch/examples ? > > You are right, that is a good idea. [...] > Upstream does that when setup.py is i

Re: ITP: Name for "real" python-pgsql module

Bernd Zeimetz pisze: Paweł Tęcza wrote: So, I'm affraid that packaging of python-pypgsql module is necessary in that situation. I'm not a Python programmer and don't want to change the sources. Well.. you could ask upstream. Actually I'd vote against adding just another PG binding as the othe