Re: numpy 1.2.1, switching to git?

2008-12-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 12:08:18AM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > >> as it is really ugly to use > > Ugly how? > Well, it's just slow once you get used to git and how fast it is, > it really sucks to wait for basic operations like "bz

Re: numpy 1.2.1, switching to git?

2008-12-21 Thread Jan Dittberner
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 09:04:33AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Cyril Brulebois writes: > > > Tristan Seligmann (20/12/2008): > > > My personal preference ordering would probably be: > > > > > > hg, bzr, svn, git git, bzr, svn I read some git stuff today and think it's superior to the other

Re: numpy 1.2.1, switching to git?

2008-12-21 Thread Ben Finney
Cyril Brulebois writes: > Tristan Seligmann (20/12/2008): > > My personal preference ordering would probably be: > > > > hg, bzr, svn, git > > git, FD, * bzr, git, hg, FD, svn -- \ “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his | `\ salary depends upon his not

Re: numpy 1.2.1, switching to git?

2008-12-21 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Tristan Seligmann (20/12/2008): > My personal preference ordering would probably be: > > hg, bzr, svn, git git, FD, * devotee to the rescue. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature