Re: numpy 1.2.1, switching to git?

2008-12-18 Thread Monty Taylor
Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: >> /me whinges that switching to bzr for packaging in general would be a >> much nicer thing overall, since then ubuntu downstream is pretty well >> bzr... >> >> (note: I use bzr for all of my other projects, so I have a

Re: [RFR] urlwatch

2008-12-18 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Adeodato Simó, 2008-12-18] > Yes, I got that. You mean: > > /usr/bin/urlwatch -> /usr/share/urlwatch/urlwatch.py > > But even with that, strace does not show that a > /usr/share/urlwatch/urlwatch.pyc file would get used when invoking > "urlwatch". oh, right, thanks -- -=[ Piotr Ożarows

Re: numpy 1.2.1, switching to git?

2008-12-18 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Piotr! On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Ondrej Certik, 2008-12-08] >> P.S. bzed, POX, isn't it time to move our packaging to git? > > I was planing it for a long time, but never found time to actually do it. > > If you volunteer to do this, please send a message to PA

Re: [RFR] urlwatch

2008-12-18 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Piotr Ożarowski [Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:46:36 +0100]: > [Adeodato Simó, 2008-12-18] > > * Piotr Ożarowski [Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:06:35 +0100]: > > > You can even install it as /usr/share/urlwatch/urlwatch.py (but still > > > symlink it without the extension) - this way you'll have additional .pyc >

Re: [RFR] urlwatch

2008-12-18 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Adeodato Simó, 2008-12-18] > * Piotr Ożarowski [Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:06:35 +0100]: > > > You can even install it as /usr/share/urlwatch/urlwatch.py (but still > > symlink it without the extension) - this way you'll have additional .pyc > > file which will speed urlwatch a little bit > > AFAIK, .p

Re: [RFR] urlwatch

2008-12-18 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Piotr Ożarowski [Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:06:35 +0100]: > You can even install it as /usr/share/urlwatch/urlwatch.py (but still > symlink it without the extension) - this way you'll have additional .pyc > file which will speed urlwatch a little bit AFAIK, .pyc files are only for imported modules, an

Re: [RFR] urlwatch

2008-12-18 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Franck Joncourt, 2008-12-13] > http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/urlwatch.git;a=summary looks good (just one question, see below). If you want me to upload it, please remove DM-Upload-Allowed for now (feel free to keep it if your regular sponsor is ok with uploading it with this flag) > /usr

Re: numpy 1.2.1, switching to git?

2008-12-18 Thread Monty Taylor
/me whinges that switching to bzr for packaging in general would be a much nicer thing overall, since then ubuntu downstream is pretty well bzr... (note: I use bzr for all of my other projects, so I have a vested interest) However... _anything_ is an improvement over svn. Monty Piotr Ożarowski

Re: RFS: python-pytc

2008-12-18 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Vernon Tang, 2008-12-18] > Now that I'm a member of the PMPT, I've committed python-pytc to svn. Could > someone take a look at it? * why not Priority: optional? * please build -dbg package * consider using debhelper7's command sequencer (man dh) instead of CDBS, it will be easier to build -db

Re: [Python-modules-team] ITP: python-pivy -- Coin binding for Python

2008-12-18 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Teemu Ikonen, 2008-12-13] > http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/pivy.git;a=summary [...] > The package is in a 'works for me' state and lintian clean, but there > may be something I missed. I'm not sure if I should build the C > extensions with than one python version, now they are built just

Re: numpy 1.2.1, switching to git?

2008-12-18 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Ondrej Certik, 2008-12-08] > P.S. bzed, POX, isn't it time to move our packaging to git? I was planing it for a long time, but never found time to actually do it. If you volunteer to do this, please send a message to PAPT mailing list, wait a week and if no one will complain, go ahead and conver

Re: ITP: Name for "real" python-pgsql module

2008-12-18 Thread Paweł Tęcza
Paweł Tęcza pisze: I don't know whether python-pypgsql and psycopg2 modules are compatible, because I don't have any experiences with them, but I can try it, of course. Unfortunately, it's not easy... It seems that Pythonfilter doesn't work with psycopg2 and now I can see the following error

Re: ITP: Name for "real" python-pgsql module

2008-12-18 Thread Paweł Tęcza
Piotr Ożarowski pisze: [Paweł Tęcza, 2008-12-18 10:49] I'm not DD, but I would like to make Debian package with python-pgsql module [1]. I need it for PostgreSQL support for Courier-Pythonfilter framework [2]. It has been debianized by Frederik Dannemare [3] and still waits for sponsoring at

Re: ITP: Name for "real" python-pgsql module

2008-12-18 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Paweł Tęcza, 2008-12-18 10:49] > I'm not DD, but I would like to make Debian package with python-pgsql > module [1]. I need it for PostgreSQL support for Courier-Pythonfilter > framework [2]. It has been debianized by Frederik Dannemare [3] and still > waits for sponsoring at mentors.d.n site

ITP: Name for "real" python-pgsql module

2008-12-18 Thread Paweł Tęcza
Hello All, I'm not DD, but I would like to make Debian package with python-pgsql module [1]. I need it for PostgreSQL support for Courier-Pythonfilter framework [2]. It has been debianized by Frederik Dannemare [3] and still waits for sponsoring at mentors.d.n site [4]. The problem with pyth

Re: [RFC] python-pyevent (unrelease)

2008-12-18 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
Hi, [Luciano Bello, 2008-12-18 00:58] > I would like to listen/read your comments about python-pyevent before upload > it. binary package name should be changed to "python-event" (source package probably as well) - you're using "import event" to load the module, right? it's arch:any package, so