Re: Packaging question on private extension modules

2008-06-02 Thread Manuel Prinz
Am Montag, 2. Juni 2008 14:52:05 schrieb Josselin Mouette: > At least, current practice in this case is to put everything > in /usr/lib. This is something I did and of course works. Currently I do install everything into /usr/share except the binary parts (.so files). I have those in /usr/lib an

Re: Packaging question on private extension modules

2008-06-02 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Manuel Prinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a Python application with private extension modules, so the package is > Arch: any. Because there is no way (at least I'm not aware of that) to split > the package because the modules are private, I can't seperate the large part > of the app out

Re: Packaging question on private extension modules

2008-06-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 31 mai 2008 à 22:00 +0200, Manuel Prinz a écrit : > I have a Python application with private extension modules, so the package is > Arch: any. Because there is no way (at least I'm not aware of that) to split > the package because the modules are private, I can't seperate the large part