Re: [Boost-build] Boost.Python: Build and Install with Python 2.4 and 2.5?

2008-05-01 Thread Stefan Seefeld
Steve, Steve M. Robbins wrote: It turns out to be simpler than that. With a small tweak to boost's Jamroot file, I'm now generating libraries without the toolset and without the Boost version decorations. I will use this for the upcoming Boost 1.35.0 Debian packages. By all means, could you

Re: [Boost-build] Boost.Python: Build and Install with Python 2.4 and 2.5?

2008-05-01 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:30:32AM -0400, David Abrahams wrote: > > on Thu Mar 13 2008, "Steve M. Robbins" wrote: > > > Actually, the only thing about Boost that causes grief to packagers is > > that the toolset name (e.g. "gcc42") is embedded in the library > > filename. I just wrote a respons

Re: Boost.Python: Build and Install with Python 2.4 and 2.5?

2008-05-01 Thread David Abrahams
on Thu Mar 13 2008, "Steve M. Robbins" wrote: > Actually, the only thing about Boost that causes grief to packagers is > that the toolset name (e.g. "gcc42") is embedded in the library > filename. I just wrote a response on Boost.Build outlining this in > some detail [1]. Embedding the compile