Re: Generation of "python" dependencies for public extensions versus python2.3

2006-07-25 Thread Loïc Minier
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > The scripts in /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/GMenuSimpleEditor call > plain "python". That's probably causing the dependency. Ok, I suspected this, but since there was no other python2.3 depends, I thought there was something wrong in the first pla

Re: Generation of "python" dependencies for public extensions versus python2.3

2006-07-25 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 22:07 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi, > > While trying to install the packages from experimental where python > is python2.4, I was surprized by the non-upgradability of the > python-gmenus package (from gnome-menus): it is built with > XS-Python-Version set to cu

Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages

2006-07-25 Thread Loïc Minier
Matthias, On Tue, Jun 13, 2006, Matthias Klose wrote: > We will prepare the transition in experimental by an upload of the > python, python-dev packages I tried testing my rtupdates scripts by installing "python" version 2.4.3-5 from experimental, but they didn't seem to run, and I coul

Generation of "python" dependencies for public extensions versus python2.3

2006-07-25 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, While trying to install the packages from experimental where python is python2.4, I was surprized by the non-upgradability of the python-gmenus package (from gnome-menus): it is built with XS-Python-Version set to current, and ends up with: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6), libglib2

Re: dpkg-repack warnings: what effect?

2006-07-25 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 14:27 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le lundi 24 juillet 2006 à 23:18 -0500, Joe Wreschnig a écrit : > > (Or, finally announce that Python 2.4 is plain too late for etch. Then > > people can have as long as they want to debate over this crap, and > > Python developers can ju

Re: dpkg-repack warnings: what effect?

2006-07-25 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 24 juillet 2006 à 23:18 -0500, Joe Wreschnig a écrit : > (Or, finally announce that Python 2.4 is plain too late for etch. Then > people can have as long as they want to debate over this crap, and > Python developers can just give up hope.) Well, isn't the whole purpose of that new policy