On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 02:07 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Matthias Klose [Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:56:29 +0200]:
>
> > > > I agree that having Python-Version in binary packages is dislikeable.
> > > > Out of curiosity, Matthias, would be a DEBIAN/pyversions file able to
> > > > provide the same infor
* Matthias Klose [Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:56:29 +0200]:
> > > I agree that having Python-Version in binary packages is dislikeable.
> > > Out of curiosity, Matthias, would be a DEBIAN/pyversions file able to
> > > provide the same information to pycentral?
^^^
> just lo
(Thanks for the CC.)
Matthias Klose wrote:
> I haven't yet seen any reasoning why people are seeing that
> information as "cluttering the database" or just as "ugly".
Causing unrelated programs like dpkg-repack to spew warning messages is,
by definition, ugly.
Using X- fields, which are intended
> Le lun 24 juillet 2006 19:52, Adeodato Sim=C3=B3 a =C3=A9crit :
> > * Pierre Habouzit [Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:11:14 +0200]:
> > > just FYI, it's not mandatory [XB-Python-Version], one can use
> > > debian/pyversions instead (with python-support).
> >
> > Hm. I can see how debian/pyversions can subst
Le lun 24 juillet 2006 19:52, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
> * Pierre Habouzit [Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:11:14 +0200]:
> > just FYI, it's not mandatory [XB-Python-Version], one can use
> > debian/pyversions instead (with python-support).
>
> Hm. I can see how debian/pyversions can substitute XS-Python-Versio
* Pierre Habouzit [Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:11:14 +0200]:
> just FYI, it's not mandatory [XB-Python-Version], one can use
> debian/pyversions instead (with python-support).
Hm. I can see how debian/pyversions can substitute XS-Python-Version
(both are available only at build time), but I fail to see h
Le lun 24 juillet 2006 16:26, Joey Hess a écrit :
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > dpkg-repack (from sid dpkg 1.13.22) gives warnings when repacking
> > python packages:
> >
> > ...
> > warning, `./dpkg-repack-5343/DEBIAN/control' contains user-defined
> > field `Python-Version'
> > ...
> >
> > What ef
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> dpkg-repack (from sid dpkg 1.13.22) gives warnings when repacking python
> packages:
>
> ...
> warning, `./dpkg-repack-5343/DEBIAN/control' contains user-defined field
> `Python-Version'
> ...
>
> What effect does this have? Can the .deb be used or not?
It's harmless,
Hi,
(I've opened a bug report against the Python Policy now, please Cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Are we talking about the case in which /usr/bin/python is still << 2.4, or
> are we talking about what such packages should do Coming Soon?
The poli
9 matches
Mail list logo