Re: [HELP] new policy with a compiled python program and generic python plugin module

2006-06-30 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le sam 1 juillet 2006 00:19, Pierre Habouzit a écrit : > Le ven 30 juin 2006 21:03, Vincent Danjean a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I'm converting one of my package (commit-tool) to the new policy. > > I was thinking it will be easy, but I found several difficulties. > > I'm able to deal with them so

Re: [HELP] new policy with a compiled python program and generic python plugin module

2006-06-30 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 30 juin 2006 à 21:03 +0200, Vincent Danjean a écrit : > I'm converting one of my package (commit-tool) to the new policy. > I was thinking it will be easy, but I found several difficulties. > I'm able to deal with them so that I will be conformed to the new > policy, but I would like

Re: [HELP] new policy with a compiled python program and generic python plugin module

2006-06-30 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le ven 30 juin 2006 21:03, Vincent Danjean a écrit : > Hi, > > I'm converting one of my package (commit-tool) to the new policy. > I was thinking it will be easy, but I found several difficulties. > I'm able to deal with them so that I will be conformed to the new > policy, but I would like to

[HELP] new policy with a compiled python program and generic python plugin module

2006-06-30 Thread Vincent Danjean
Hi, I'm converting one of my package (commit-tool) to the new policy. I was thinking it will be easy, but I found several difficulties. I'm able to deal with them so that I will be conformed to the new policy, but I would like to do the Right Things. Here is the situation. My package has

Re: RFS: gaupol, chardet, sqlalchemy

2006-06-30 Thread Piotr Ozarowski
Piotr Ozarowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I'm looking for sponsor for my 3 packages: > * gaupol (python app., new upstream) > * chardet (python module, not yet in Debian - more info below) > * sqlalchemy (python module, second NMU - see [1] for more info) gaupol and chardet are already uploaded (than

Re: Python independant binary extensions

2006-06-30 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 06:43:22PM +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le vendredi 30 juin 2006 à 17:38 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit : > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:16:40PM +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Python-support already checks the md5sums of th

Re: Python independant binary extensions

2006-06-30 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 30 juin 2006 à 17:38 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit : > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:16:40PM +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Python-support already checks the md5sums of the files to install, but > > it excludes the .so because files are moved to /usr/share and it wo

Re: Python independant binary extensions

2006-06-30 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:16:40PM +0200, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Python-support already checks the md5sums of the files to install, but > it excludes the .so because files are moved to /usr/share and it would > violate the FHS. I also thought this would never happen. > > I

Re: Python independant binary extensions

2006-06-30 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 30 juin 2006 à 15:48 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > > I can add the handling of this case by putting them e.g. > > in /usr/lib/python-support/python-foo/all/. > > Having the same .so for python 2.3 and python 2.4 doesn't mean that it > will work on python 2.5. > > So if you put i

Re: News from the python policy transition

2006-06-30 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 6/29/06, Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:25:17 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le mer 28 juin 2006 23:20, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : >> So you don't have any excuse to not update your packages any more. >> About 60% of the Python modules have already been updated,

Re: Python independant binary extensions

2006-06-30 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Don't you think it'd be nice to add support to python-support and > > python-central for that case ? > > Python-support already checks the md5sums of the files to install, but > it excludes the .so because files are moved to /usr/share and it would

Re: Python independant binary extensions

2006-06-30 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 29 juin 2006 à 22:09 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit : > Hi all, > > I'm currently working on getting libxml2 (and later libxslt) to the new > policy, and actually noticed something interesting: > -rw-r--r-- root/root273888 2006-06-29 22:02 > ./usr/lib/python-support/python-libxml2/python